9_2_Handout

# 9_2_Handout - 9.2 Inference for Two-Way Tables exclusive...

This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

9.2 Inference for Two-Way Tables exclusive territory - new store will be the only representative of the franchise in a specified territory and will not have to compete with other outlets of the same chain Effect of having an exclusive territory on the success of the firm? Observed number of firms Exclusive Territory? Success? Yes No Total Yes 108 15 123 No 34 13 47 Total 142 28 170 explanatory variable- column variable (Exclusive Territory?) response variable- row variable (Success?) Column percents for firms Exclusive Territory? Success? Yes No Yes 76% 54% No 24% 46% Total 100% 100% The difference between the percents of successes among the two types of firms is quite large. Is this difference statistically significant? The hypothesis: no association H 0 : There is no association between the row variable and the column variable. H a : There is an association between the row variable and the column variable. “For two-way tables in general, the alternative includes many possibilities [think about a 3x3 two-way table]. Because it includes all of the many kinds of association that are possible, we cannot describe H a as either one-sided or two-sided.” (594) c = # of columns r = # of rows

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page1 / 5

9_2_Handout - 9.2 Inference for Two-Way Tables exclusive...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online