This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Chapter Three: Biology and Psychology in Serial Murder 1) Give examples of how current research and theories link biological facts to violent behavior. How useful are these for understanding serial killers? 2) Basically how is insanity understood by the criminal justice system? Include in your response the most common test currently used for insanity.  Insanity legal term CJS  Not psychiatric diagnosis  Applies to “…state of mind of offender at time of offense” [Hickey 2006:65].  Used serious crime When defense see any other defense untenable Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity go psy institutiton until ruled recovered For some = life sentence  < 1% raise insanity defense Success rate even lower Nonviol more likely raise Most serial killers do not raise  Specific tests to determine Most taken from common law McNaughten Rule Time of offense whether the defendant knew what he or she was doing or whether the defendant knew that what he or she was doing was wrong. Used in 16 states “fails to include situations in which off can distinguish between right and wrong but are simply unable to control their beh” [Hickely 2006:66] Brawner Rule Substantial capacity Test Found in the Model Penal Code suggests that insanity should be defined as the lack of a substantial capacity to control one’s behavior....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 04/17/2008 for the course CRIM 220 taught by Professor Kelley during the Spring '08 term at Longwood.
- Spring '08