Course Hero Logo

Brief 3- Muller v Oregon.pdf - Muller v. Oregon 1908 208...

Course Hero uses AI to attempt to automatically extract content from documents to surface to you and others so you can study better, e.g., in search results, to enrich docs, and more. This preview shows page 1 out of 1 page.

Muller v. Oregon (1908) 208 U.S 412Facts: Throughout this case, there was talks about the differences in women and men and whatexactly their body can handle in terms of work. It was stated that the women’s body was at adisadvantage due to their maternal functions.Issue: The issue is whether or not the state of Oregon can limit the amount of hours a womenworked but not limit the amount of hours a man can work.Held: Yes, Oregon was able to limit the amount of hours a women can work without having to
End of preview. Want to read the entire page?

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

Term
Fall
Professor
NoProfessor
Tags
U S state, Muller v Oregon, Oregon Supreme Court

Unformatted text preview: limit the amount of hours a man can work because of the role of men v women. Reasoning: The reasoning for this is because there were points made that it is a women’s ‘job’ to be in the home and take care of their responsibilities around the house/of other people because that is their maternal functions and that is what they need to do. Concurrences: There was no concurring because of the decision. Dissent: There was no dissent because of the unanimous decision....
View Full Document

Newly uploaded documents

Show More

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture