JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1 - JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm JHI 1300 Dr. Leo Landman F214 Syllabus: Topics Discussed: -readings for each topics -not all are required -required readings for info not covered in class -Q's on midterm, final, on readings -Midterm = 40% of test grade, Final = 60% of test grade -not cumulative -participation -Term Paper -any topic w/in time period -list of suggested topics -worth 10% of grade J = Jews RG = Raysh Gelusa SG = Sa'adya Gaon Anan = Anan ben David Theo = Theodosis, Emperor of Rome R'Gersh = Rabbaynu Gershom, M'Or HaGola 1/24/00 Intro to Medieval Philosophical Thought I. Time Period A-not know when began, or when ended -1-assessment of limits made after time period B-diff. from middle ages C-Known as Dark Ages D-Era Length--abt. 1000 years -1-Began: -a-6th century -b-7th century-632 CE-conquest of Europe by Moslems -2-Ended -a-ended in year 1500 -b-as late as 17th century E-Between Classical & Renaissance Period -1-most historians feel periods should be known by own accomplishments, not in comparison to other eras F-Diff. from Modern -1-Church dominated life & religious thought -2-philo -a-concerned with search for G-d's Truth & will of G-d -b-philo's tried to synthesize relig. thought with Greek & Roman thought Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 1 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman II. Diff. for Jews than other peoples A-lived under Xian & Moslem rule -1-Kings, Kalifs -2-stemmed from Judaism, but claimed Jews distorted true relig. -3-deliberately oppressed Jews, each for own reasons Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm B-Xian oppression -1-rejeciton of faith -a-Jews rejected Xian relig. & crucified Yeshu -b-claimed J spiritually blind by using false & illegal relig. -c-J felt that worshiping Trinity = A"Z -2-made set rules, so J knew what not to violate -a-pogroms more "predictable" -b-J persecuted for usury towards Xians -also forced into peddling b/c couldn't own land or go into business -c-J not allowed to join guilds or work -d-J couldn't own land, so couldn't farm -e-J had high taxes -C-Jewish Views of Xianity -1-Tos. Felt Trinity = A"Z for Jews, not for Goyim -2-Meiri-Trinity used to be A"Z; now = have ideologies that aren't paganism D-Relevance in Jewish law -1-Napoleon's Sanhedrin & 12 Q's -a-Sanhedrin composed of relig. & non-relig. Jews -b-asked abt. marriage -dep. if considered Akum or not -some cited Meiri as allowance for intermarriage ("Lo Tischaten Bam") -c-R' Dovid Sinsheimer-chas v'shalom to marry them & have social intercourse -2-Gemara: Grapes & Wine trampled (pressed) by Akum -a-Goyim worked in Jewish fields -b-R' Tam-mutar b/c don't know how to be minasech yayin -c-R"I-assur b/c status doesn't change -d-all regarding business law & issur v'heter E-Moslem oppression -1-rejections of faith -a-J rejected Mohammed, Koran -b-accused J of falsifying Torah texts -2-lived side by side, but Moslems lacked set rules -a-J never knew when to expect pogroms by Moslems F-Conversions -1-most J's refused to convert & therefore died G-Jews considered separate group & ID as Jews -1-rest of goyim thought J should not maintain own culture H-Jewish Economics -1-oppressed by gov't and self-hating J's -a-"blaming the victim" -2-theories -a-usury from J culture -b-J's like to exploit -c-J naturally sly Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 2 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman Jews Under Islam I. Centers of Learning & Jewish Rulers A-under Moslem rule B-traced to Shivas Tziyon 586 BCE C-also traced to Resh Galusa -1-first Resh Galusa = Rav Huna HaResh Galusa -contemporary of Rebbe -2-R' Nachman-his father was probably Resh Galusa -had symbol of authority: Mace, rod -3-as important as Nassi, but in charge of galus Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm D-under Parthian & Sessanian (211CE) -1-RG represented J to Goyim -2-appointed judges -3-appointed to... -4-collected taxes -a-also had to pay taxes to Persian gov't E-Iggeres Rav Sh'rira Gaon (Levine's ed. 73-74) -1-aliya of Ezra & Zerubavel had heads of Sanhedrin--Majority From Bavel -2-spread Torah, RG from Bais Dovid existed at time of Hillel HaZaken -3-through Rebbe's death, RG's ruled in Bavel, but the Roshay Misivasa did not -4-implications: -a-family of RG stemmed from Bais Dovid -proof: Yerushalmi Gem. Ta'anis 4:2, from later period -b-office of RG existed from beg. Of 2nd BHMK -5-problem: -a-have not history of anyone in this position a the time of beg. of 2nd BHMK -family of RG stemmed from Bais Dovid F-Sources for R' Sh'rira Gaon -1-Yerushalmi Gem. Ta'anis 4:2, from later period -a-geneological scroll stating yichus of Tana'im -Hillel descendent of Dovid... -Rav Chiyya dec. from Sh'fatya ben Avital (Dovid's wife) -Rebbe from Dovid -2-Kesubos 62b: -a-Rebbe arranged marriage of his daughter to Rav Chiyya (Tanna from Bavel) -b-daughter died during writing sh'tar -c-examined yichus, found that Rav Chiyya descended from Shimi, Dovid's brother; Rebbe from Sh'fatya -d-therefore marriage deemed not suitable -3-theory: scroll originally only had Hillel on it, and others put own names down -a-we don't have scroll itself; if could, could compare handwriting styles G-Individuals who claimed from Bais Dovid -1-Chashmonaim -2-Herodians-through Chashmonaim mother -3-Yeshu-red bearded like Dovid -Yeshua ben Pantera-pantera = derogatory term for panther; belongs to mamzer -4-Rebbe -5-Rav Chiyya -6-RG 1/26/00 Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 3 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman II. Resh Galusa (RG ) During Amoraim A-RG had high authority B-Title "Rav" -1-title from Yeshivos, not RG -2-needed dual appointment to be Judge -a-from Rosh Yeshivos -b-from RG -3-diff. bet. Judge & Rav -a-Rav penalized if made judgement mistake, whereas Judge not Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm C-Disputes amongst Courts -1-thought they didn't know enough even if appointed by RG -2-R' Nachman, Rabbah bar Avuha appointed by RG -a-shows 1 untrue b/c surely knew how to learn -3-Sukkah 10b--??? -4-Courts not appointed by RG = tolerated by RG courts b/c needed them -a-had same rules & halachos as RG courts -b-RG courts had backing of RG & state, so didn't need to pay if made errors -c-other courts had to pay if erred--Lav Minaichu ...??? -5-Problems -a-all courts really subject to RG, although some more then other -6-Dunath--Divray Yimay Am Olam -a-intermingled time periods--took info of ...??? -1-by 4th century, all calendar matters sent to Bavel, but not to RG -2-Gem. R"H 19(?)--sent to Mar Ukvra, a Gaon Rosh Yeshiva (= Amorai) ??? (R' Acha'i Gaon mentioned in gem., from 8th century--put his own comments in ) D-Rav Nachman's lifetime E-Appointment of RG -1-had to pay for appointment, so accused of buying position -a-really not, b/c hereditary by laws of yerusha and simply payed a fee -2-induction ceremony recorded by _________? -a-Dovid ben Zakkai, appointed 920 -b-conducted in Arabic -c-resembled coronation -3-Nosson HaBavli--RG Ceremony -a-choir sang -b-when entered room, ppl. stood until he sat on tower -c-R"Y of Sura entered, bowed to RG & sat at right of throne -d-R"Y of Pump. Entered, bowed to RG, sat at left of throne -e-chazan pronounced b'racha softly, only few heard it F-Power of RG -1-3-4th cent., very powerful -2-power waned, Roshay Yeshivos (RY) become more powerful -3-by Gaonim's time, RG had more power than in beginning -a-appointed Gaonim (= RY), Judges, B"D -b-deposed judges -c-power ran outside J community -d-chain of succession over 1000 years III. RG during time of Gaonim (=RY) A-11th cent.--very weak. Causes: -8 versions of what happened to cause the following -2-Bustanai-under Islam, was given wife from defeated Persian emporor -a-wife given to him as slave, but needed to give get shichrur in order to marry her -not known if she did go free b4 marriage -b-caused lineage of RG to be Q'd Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 4 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman -3-R' Sa'adya Gaon-not from RG lineage -a-strong willed, fought with RG -b-was deposed by RG for poskining against him Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm D-8th cent. = Beginning of Yeshivos Rise E-Yarchei Kallah--started in Gem. Time, became strong in 8th cent. -1-Adar & Elul learning sessions -2-Gaon & Yeshivos chose mesechta to learn for next 5 months -3-included both rabbanim & layman together -a-proof = stated diff. in p'sak for diff. types of ppl. -1-powerful b/c RG weakened & ppl. sent RY's sh'aylos -2-Gaonim added t'filla to Shabbos davening = Yakum Purkan -3-Gaonim sometimes served as RG's to appoint next RG F-Sura & Pumpidisa -1-Sura = far from Bahgdad, so didn't interfere with RG (who was there) -2-Pump. = 40 mi. from Bag. -a-R' Natronai (1st RY by that name), ruled with iron fist b/c no threat from father in law, RG -caused many ppl. learning in Pump to leave for Sura -3-8th cent.-R' Achaii, author of Sh'iltos -a-not appointed at first time tried for RY, got it 2nd time -b-style of writing of all s'fray p'sak in Sh'iltos style until Rambam -4-dissension bet. R"Y -a-had t'filla for peace bet. schools -b-Sura considered higher rank -RG addressed Gaon of Sura as Gaon, but not Pump -c-Gaon of Sura received all kibudim first -d-1006 CE, Kohen Tzeddek, Gaon of Pump, wanted peace & equality -achieved by R' Hai Gaon's time -5-Minhagim -a-Sura-followed minhagay of E"Y -b-Pump-indep, followed minhagay Bavel -6-Shu"T -a-only Gaon could actually write Teshuvos -7-served as Av Bais Din -a-from 6 families -b-known as Dayyana D'Bava b/c courts held outside yeshivos -8-seating in Yeshivos -a-7 rows of 10 students, with Gaon at head, like Sanhedrin -b-in 1st row, 7 were called Roshay Kallah, called Aloofs -other 3 were Chavarim -c-Aloof's each taught to ppl in back, called mishanim -mishanim taught kids mishnayos G-Yemen & Tichiyas HaMaysim -1-Temanim asked sh'ayla to Shmuel ben Eli Gaon-RY and Rambam -2-Rambam-Ma'amar T'chiyas HaMaysim-dismisses Gaonim's ideas based on gem. -3-Gaonim issues fiats (decrees) even though weakened against Rambam's ideas -a-wrote T'shivos Gaonay Mizrach u'Maariv -said what they poskined was law, not to reject it or change it -b-Chemday G'niza-whoever disputes gaonim is like warring vs. HASHEM H-End of Gaonic Time Period -1-Gaonim lasted through 1200's -a-sh'ailos recorded in Shmuel ben Eli, Rambam -2-Daniyyel b. Chizkiyah, gaon -a-successor's letter to Rambam read aloud, ppl. stood in respect -3-Azarya ____ & Dovid b. Hodaya called themselves Nassi, although held same position as RG Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 5 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman -a-Gaonim lasted until 1341 & 1376 1/31/00 Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm IV. Nigud & Naggid A-RG ruled entire galus from Baghdad -1-when RG office ended, regional leaders, Naggidim, took over B-Naggid's Origins & End -1-usually rose from court physician, counselor to Moslem court, kativ-royal scribe -a-had done communal service in other areas, and Kalif therefor chose him -2-appointed either with or without Jewish community's approval -a-some had yichus to RG's, others not -b-some were learned, others not -c-basically an administrator; always observant Jews from Rabbinate (/= Rabbis) -3-full title: Naggid Am Kel -a-1st used by Shimon HaChashmoni -b-HaNaggid = "ethnarchus" in Greek; -"Ethnark" = position lower than a king -c-next to use title = Mar Ukva (see above) -his cong. Brought S"T to him in shul -d-Rambam's family given title -never considered self as Naggid -4-1517-Turks conquered ______, Naggid title stopped -a-Ya'akov Ibn Chaim Tamid vs. Betzalael Ashkenazi (not theShittah Mikubetzes) -b-gov't abolished title to avoid getting involved in fight -1-non-titular Naggid but fulfilled same role -2-family -a-silk merchant family -3-Kalif's appointment -a-imprisoned YiY soon, b/c refused to collect taxes from Jews -4-Avraham Ibn Daud (not Raavad that's against Rambam) -a-author of Sefer HaKabbalah -b-Chanoch, main opponent of YiY, mourned his death b/c YiY supported the poor C-Yaakov Ibn Yan (10-11th cent) D-Ceremony -1-said following phrase-a-gave kavod to memory of RG position -b-said powers of ruling from RG E-Position -1-served as RG -a-issued cherem -b-officiated marriages -c-acted as judges -d-ruled over Rabbinate, Karaites, Shomronim V. Chacham Bashi--in Turkey A-Sultan Mechmed II conq'd. Constantinople 1453 B-SultM2 appointed Moshe Capsali -1-wrote T'shuvas -2-represented J in imperial counsel -3-practical to keep 1 person responsible for relig. community -a-did same for Greek Ortho church C-title Chachom Bashi -a-Chachom = S'fardic title for Rav -b-Bashi = Turkish title "Pasha" mispronounced by Arabs (can't pronounce P's) Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 6 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman D-power -1-ruled only in Constantenople Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm VI. Jews in Moslem state A-no single approach to studying time -1-Sa'adya Gaon and other writers represent own opinions and viewpoints, not representative of general opinion at time B-most lay ppl. didn't write, so don't know their opinions -1-pp. Dissatisfied with Moslem courts -a-corrupt, took invalid & dishonest witnesses -b-all lay ppl. disliked courts & denounced them--Xians, J, Moslems alike -c-when Rabbanim critiqued courts, did so for 2 reasons: -i-corrupt -ii-wanted J to go to B"D instead -2-Baghdad courts honest -a-sh'taros accepted in B"D -b-gave kavod & tolerated other spokesmen from diff. relig. groups -3-10-11th cent, ppl. started writing C-Crusades 1096 onwards -1-Age of Tolerance, 9-10th cent, ended -a-J caught bet. 2 warring relig. -2-Rambam--Iggeres to Chachmay Lunel (S. France.)--in Shu"T Rambam -a-said cultural future of J in West, under Xian D-Political Problems -1-Prof. Goithein-relig. ppl. shunned gov't service, thought it opposed G-d's Will -2-J refused to eat with gov't officials b/c corrupt -a-Gem. Says that their food is from oppressing poor ppl. & extortion -3-most ppl. felt that the state = G-d willed institution -a-"Divine Rights of Kings"--J believed kings got power from G-d -source B"M 13a (?) -b-ppl. didn't criticized leaders or gov't b/c feared retribution -c-employed flattery towards Arabs -d-instituted prayers for Shalom Medina -e-humans = social animal, need structure -4-J accepted Shmuel's statement of Dina d'Malchusa Dina -a-Chazal limited it to monetary matters -taxes -b-new limitations made by Gaonim & Rishonim -Teshuvos HaGaonim-sultan appointed by G-d -c-Ran-Nedarim 28a -davka with Malchay Akum b/c the land is his & can exile BN"Y -not applies to Malchay Yisrael, b/c all J are shutafim in it -d-R' Elazar M'Mintz-Akum's land so can tell us what to do -e-Rashbam-B"B 54a-when move into new place, give up certain rights and privileges for betterment of group -Joc Rousseau-said Rashbam's statement 700 years later-called it Social Contract -5-Limitations to DmD: -a-shaveh lakol-can't just be law against J -b-not rules of spec. king, but entire historical gov't. 2/2/00 -6-Rambam' DmD Limitations: G'zayla 5:17-18 Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 7 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm -a-applies when kings' coins accepted throughout land, indic. Acceptance of king and of his sovereignty -b-if not accepted, then he's a gazlan & listim, and no need to follow -7-Muslim laws -a-dhidi-Arabic term for protected non-Muslim subjects of Muslims -b-extracted heavy taxes for this protection -if not paid, took away lands or tortured wife -c-T'shuva Gaonim-Harkavi 346-abt. giving false get to wife in order to get out of very high taxes -i-as divorcee, not responsible for husbands debts, so couldn't claim $ -ii-later reunited and joined monies again -iii-only allowed in extreme cases of extreme taxes The Karaites & Sa'ayda Gaon I. R' Sa'adya Gaon A-Mission in Life: to unite all Jewery -1-battled Karaiyim -a-Chivi al Balchi-Karai leader -2-battled Jews -a-ben Meir-b-Dovid b. Zakkai-3-facilitate Hebrew amongst J -a-wrote Emunos v'Dayos -i-def. J vs. Xianity -ii-repudiate all heretical teachings -iii-reconcile Judaism w/general secular philo. In method (not content) -iv-rational philo. -b-Siddur -unify world J through single form of prayer -4-did not specialize in particular area of J life & disciplines -a-wanted to serve J community through all aspects of J culture -b-also wrote payrush on Sefer Yetzira, to show that even at rationalist, still accepted mysticism -some claim he was founder of Medieval Kabbalah; FALSE B-R' Sa'adya (882- ) Writings -1-902, wrote Egron, a philological treatise (on origin of language) -2-905, wrote treatise vs. Anan b. David, founder of Karaism C-Calendar -1-sources -a-Nassan HaBavli -b-R' Sh'rira Gaon -2-through 4th cent., Chodesh was made by r'iya -a-in hands of Chachamy E"Y -b-Chochmay Bavli tried to take command, were rejected by bans -3-Rav vs. Shmuel -a-Shmuel knew Rakiya like knew streets of Nahardaya -i-set up calendar for 6 months. (one cycle) -ii-sent to Rav, said he could now make calendar forever, from Bavel -b-Shmuel wanted to not be dependent on Rav in E"Y -i-Rav said to stop relying on calendar, or else Shmuel would be branded "Zaken Mamray" -ii-wanted to keep power of Chodesh in E"Y -iii-Zaken Mamray = Sanhedrin member who votes against San., and poskins like it vs. San. Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 8 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm -iv-i.e. Shmuel would be against entire Chochmay E"Y, and likened to Z"M -4-internal workings -a-standard shana p'shuta: 354 day lunar year -b-sometimes chassar year nec. w/353 -c-sometimes malay year w/355 -d-if need p'shuta, Cheshvan & Kislev standard to 29 & 30 days -e-if need chasser, Cheshvan & Kislev changed to 29 days each -f-if need malay, Cheshvan & Kislev changed to 30 & 30 days -5-determining when Chasser/Malay, dep. on 4 Dichiyos/Sh'arim (postponements/gates) rules -a-Gate to New Year-R"H can only fall out on 4 days of the week: M, T, Th, Sh -b-lo adu rosh-can't be on S, W, F -i-reason for not S: Hoshana Rabbah can't be on Shabbos b/c need aravos -ii-reason not W: Y"K on F, and can't cook for Shabbos -iii-reason not F: Y"K on Sunday, can't prep. For it, and Hoshana Rabbah on Shabbos -c-Gem. R"H 20a -if New Moon seen on these days, R"Ch = next day -need to seen Moon b4 noon time for R"H to be that day -if see New Moon after chatzos, R"H = next day -if see NM on Shabbos, aydus given, R"H on Monday, 2 days later -6-923, it was anticipated that would need 2 day dichiya -a-NM of Tishray would have been on Shabbos just past Chatzos -b-Elul would have 31 days, which would be impossible -c-made adjustment in year b4 by making Chashvan & Kislev malay D-Ben Meir -1-Sura & Pump. Lost power -2-wanted to take control over calendar -a-wanted to restore authority to E"Y -b-wanted to fix rift bet yeshivos -c-3-claimed yichus to Bais Dovid -4-attacked Calendar w/following possible (FALSE) reasons: -5-attacks: -a-wanted to change rule, that if NM happened <35 min. after chatzos, it should still not be postponed -R"H would have remained on Shabbos -b-R' Sh'rira-NM on Shabbos, just after Chatzos -c-b.M said that since less than 641 of chalakim, not to postpone R"H until Monday -d-no explanation y b.M chose this exact time span -6-2 explanations of y b.M did this: -a-to partly offset (35 of 56 min.)diff. of Chatzos bet. Bavel & Y"m, b/c chachomim based on Bavel -problem: not possible--r'iya clearly based on Y"m time in Shas -b-Epstein-wanted to reduced total # of Dichiyos -7-G'niza Scrolls explanation -a-protesting power of Ibur HaShana of Chochmay E"Y -8-RG alarmed by b.M's calculations -a-told him to stop calculations -b-b.M didn't, sent letters to J to follow him -c-chochmay Bavel sent letters to bM, to tell him not to make J violate Tishray as they did Pesach in Nissan -9-Sa'adya's Role-atkd. bM abt. power of controlling J life -a-said that Chochmay Bavel had been setting calendar & had power to do so E-Rambam Hil' R"H 2 -1-wrote on r'iya methods -2-perplexed by those who say that calendar alone, not r'iya at all Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 9 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm -a-said R' Sa'adya wrote vs. bM, not with truth nec., but in order to disprove him & destroy his arguments 2/7/00 F-SG Appointed Aloof 927 CE -1-b.Meir advised against this -2-RG needed SG as aloof, did so even though knew it was trouble -3-RG made SG take shavua: -a-not to takes sides against RG in halachic arguments -b-not to call anybody else RG G-Caused Ill Will -1-had strict rules abt. usury-ribbus -a-had friends in banking -needed them to raised funds -b-held that it was assur to take ribbis from goyim!!! -chumra -c-felt that taking ribbis from goyim was destructive to J -3-idea: in every generation of Jewry, there is a sage fitting to unite all J -a-ppl. thought he spoke abt. himself (probably did) -b-distinctions put on ppl., just like certain days which are distinct w/special mitzvos/issurim -c-upset RG, b/c thought would usurp his rule -3-all these lead to ben Zakkai problem H-RG ben Zakkai (RGbZ) -1-when poskined, needed affirmation from both Gaonim -2-brought case to SG for confirmation -a-case of 7000 dinar -b-SG wanted to avoid issue, hoped it would go to other gaon and would veto it -c-if other gaon would veto, SG would not have to rule on it -3-historians a the time wrote abt. dispute -a-Nassaan HaBavli-historian-in favor of SG -b-Sh'rira Gaon-historian-neutral -c-Dovid Ibn Daud (Ra'avad historian)-violently vs. RG -4-RGbZ's son tried to fix problem -a-then tried to threaten him -b-SG's attendants through him out -5-1st year of controversy, SG deposed RGbZ -a-b/c RGbZ went against halacha -b-appointed new RG, Chassan Moshe -c-wrote Sefer HaGollalim -against ppl. who wrote p'skay halacha w/o enough knowledge -d-RGbZ deposed SG, had to hide in Baghdad 932-933 -lasted for 6 years -6-isolation years -a-siddur -b-Emunos v'Dayos -c-reconciled w/RGbZ b/c of public opinion -i-not liked SG deposed -ii-not approved of RGbZ being atk'd. -7-later years -a-took softer tone -b-died 942 CE I-Philosophy -1-Religious Rationalism-1st to prove philosophy Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 10 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm -a-used Greek & Arab philo -b-Emunos v'Dayos written in Arabic -1st philo work since Aristotle -2-corresponded with Yitzchak Yisraeli, oculist -a-SG wrote on medicine -3-idea: 3 ways of revelation (ITT) -a-Intellect-can provide own concepts to be able to comprehend Tradition and Torah -b-Tradition (non-mystical Kabbalah)-c-Torah-need to acquire above so can acquire Torah -4-Q on this: For what do you need Mattan Torah if you can get it from Intellect? -a-Rambam's 2 answer in Moreh Nevuchim: -i-not everybody is a philo -chukim = G'zaras HaKasuv/HaMelech -ii-takes time until philo figures out all tennants & reasons & needs to be chayav in mitzvos b4hand -b-SG-need Mattan Torah to confirm reason (-c-Mendelsohn-need reason to confirm Torah) -5-Man's Intellect rooted in history: makes new items, and makes life easier -a-man central to all Creation, making him special in world -i-needs to arrive at Ratzon HKBH through own reasoning -ii-man preserves past, perceives most of future -iii-uses intellect to cause beasts to do work -iv-makes wells to plant -v-makes wheels to travel -vi-man makes art -b-man diff. then rest of creation b/c uses intellect to control world -c-Koheles 6:1-"I've seen all things under sun, and they are all foolishness & vexation of spirit" -i-Sh'lomo not speaking abt. deeds -ii-when deeds assoc. w/HKBH, are harmonious; when not, intellect alone can lead one astray -6-4 Proofs for Creation of World (only doing one) -a-opposite of Creation: Eternity of world -b-if world existed from eternity, then infinite time must have elapsed to this point in time -c-said this was impossible b/c infinities of time overlaps (ERROR) -each sub-division of time has infinity of -d-didn't understand diff. sizes infinity (alef null et. al.) -7-Unity of HASHEM -a-if there are 2+ gods omnipotent, either one can do everything -or one needs the other -b-if neither is capable of creating w/o the other, not gods -c-if one can create and other cannot, other is not omnipotent -8-Division of Mitzvos -a-sichliyos-rational, must be recog. By every human being, goy and J alike -murder = rational -b-shimiyos-M'Pi HaSh'muos-traditional-not inherently right or wrong, but are made so by HKBH -i-imposed in order to increase reward for ppl. -ii-even these are rational -Shabbos-resting allows us to learn & daven better A-rise of Islam in 7th cent CE B-J began to Q traditions II-Controversy with Karaites & Anan ben Dovid -1-saw how Islam changed over time, cast off practices Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 11 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman -2-J wanted to do so also Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm C-Anan b. Dovid -1-talmid of R' Yehudai Gaon -2-uncle Yitzchak, father David -a-Yitzchak appointed RG -3-Anan considered self crown prince, obnoxious -a-suspected of heretical leanings -4-when father died, gaonim passed over him to younger brother Chananya, 7__ -5-Kalif approved Chanaya, Anan rej. It, thrown in jail -6-in prison, met Muslim jurist-Abu Chanifa -a-advised Anan to declare self leader of new sect -b-to join with bMeir, run calendar by r'iya -c-Kalif would be sympathetic to this, b/c Arabs follow r'iya 2/9/00 D-Anan's Philo: each person decides what religiosity is -1-prob: impossible to have communal life -a-no regard for Chachomim -2-adhered to literal Tanach -3-applied R' Yishmael's 13 rules -a-kal v'chomer -b-binyan av -c-g'zera shava-very often -4-made drashos w/many words -a-including word "es" -b-Chazal in Gem. Said that "es" was superfluous -5-used many methodologies of Chazal E-Chachomim disagreed especially w/g'zera shava -1-b/c need mesorah for it F-Anan's Rulings for Karaites & Minhagim -1-did not deny fact that need to be doresh -a-instead wanted to be doresh differently than Chazal -2-wanted to find more depth through drashos -3-not ascetics -a-fasted etc. -4-made many new issurim -a-life became unbearable to strongest followers -5-e.g. issur like eating during Ramadam -a-decreed fast for many consecutive days -b-13th Adar-23rd Nissan -6-e.g. "Lo sivaru aish b'chol moshvosaychem" -a-prohibited to have any fire burning in house, even if was light b4 Shabbos -b-sh'ayla: if leave fire burning from Friday, can you put it out? -i-one issur of kibbuy vs. constant issurim of light fire -c-rejection of Medrash Tanchuma: oneg = hadlakas nayros -d-rejection of Mishnah Bameh Madlikin: women die in childbirth if not light candles -7-rej. Essay Docheh Lo Ta'assay -a-no hierarchy in mitzvos -b-no bris on Shabbos -c-Karban Pesach not docheh Shabbos -8-Matzah-Lechem Oni = s'irim (barley), not chittim (wheat) -a-chittah = chametz -9-no issur of bassar v'chalev -a-didn't eat meat anyway, b/c no BHMK -10-assur to drink wine Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 12 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm -a-didn't drink anyway, b/c no BHMK -b-no issur of yayyin nesech -11-lo adu Pesach -a-can't fall out on S, W F -12-"b'chavesh uvachatzir" -a-said sex was assur on shabbos b/c "planting seed" -13-vayihyu l'bassar achas -a-chassan's relatives can't marry kallah's relatives -14-t'fillin eliminated -15-davenning 2x daily -a-substituted passages of t'hillim for t'filla -b-said Sh'ma -16-Gentile/Jew separation -a-goyim couldn't warm water for Jews -17-"al yaytzay ish mimkomo" -a-can't leave house on Shabbos -18-Gerim milah -a-only ger can circumcise new gerim -19-Es chokosai tishmoro (Sh'mos 19) -a-next to k'layim, b/c J should segregate from goyim -b-Ezra 10:11-not marrying "amay haaretz v'nashim hanochriyos" -c-resulting in segregation -i-resolution of all problems = leave the relig. -ii-Anan used cherem to disallow deviance from his own rules G-Later Karaite Practices -1-leniencies towards Shabbos -a-all things permitted on it that -2-women could perform bris -a-bris could be done with scalpel, not scissors anymore -3-children -a-had to perform all mitzvos from beg. Of speech H-Effectiveness of Karaites -1-in Spain only in Toledo, Telovaro -a-Ra'avad, historian, staunch enemy -b-later in Castille only -c-by 1179CE there were very few (?) I-R' Natronai b. Chilai Gaon -1-First to oppose Karaites -2-100 years after Anan's death -3-Quirqisani-prominent speaker of Karaites -a-said R' Hai Gaon wrote trans. Document of all Karaite writings, found sources for all of them in Rabbanim -b-later said never saw it, only heard of it J-Polemic Literature bet. Karaites & Rabbanim -1-challenged Rabbanim to think and set forth opinions -2-acceptance of Talmud Bavli helped by these disputes -3-movement in Bavel to make Bavli universal work of law K-Rejection of Anan -1-possible mamzerus in mishpacha -2-had questionable opinions (most likely) L-Book personal Talmud of own opinions -1-approach similar to RG, but claimed that only his practices constituted halacha -2-had absolute authority -3-wanted to transform own laws into universal law -4-had midrashay aggada Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 13 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman -5-justified strictures as being part of Avaylay Tziyon 2/14/00 Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm M-Jerusalem as center of K activity N-Failure of K's in 10th cent. -1-K's that didn't live in Y"m called those that did shoshanim -2-purpose of life Avalay Tziyon -1-owed to austere, hopeless lifestyle -2-chumras didn't inspire new members -3-ppl. attracted to yeshivos of Baval and E"Y III-Other Jewish Leaders A-Jewish Leader at time of Karaite failure: Chasdai Ibn Shaprut -1-full name: Abu Yusuf Chasdai Ibn Shaprut -2-in Moslem countries, was court physician -a-had polit. Influence in Moslem -b-from 9___-____ -3-well versed in lang., successful diplomat on behalf of Spain -a-won friendships from various emperors -i-also cured them of illnesses -b-he and family friendly with leaders -4-most famous for letter to Khazars -a-see R' Yehuda HaLayvi's Kuzari -i-kingdom wanted to convert, so king invited various leaders -ii-converted to J -b-in contact w/them after conversion -i-served as commerce advisor -c-praised milit. Victories -d-argument if actually sent it -i-expressed own ideas in own styles -ii-name in acrostic form at beginning of each line -5-influence on J culture -a-$ support to yeshivos -b-invited scholars to come to Spain, lead yeshivos there -c-given title of Resh Kallah b/c helped Bavli yeshivos -6-wealthy, powerful -a-become despotic dictator -7-conflict Menachem Ibn Saruk -a-got angry at MIS, withdrew support & punished him -b-MIS's poetry evidence of this -i-said got beaten up on Shabbos by thugs B-Shmuel HaNaggid (Ibn Nagrella) (933-) -1-lived through 1056 -a-aristocrat -b-talmud chachom, posek halacha -c-Hebrew poet of Spain -d-born in Cordova, engaged in overseas commerce -2-w/conflicts of 1013, fled to Malaga -3-Shmuel appointed to Granada's gov't -a-Ra'avad-he wrote letters to Vizier for mistress of house -i-vizier held him in high esteem -4-1020, charges brought against him -a-removed from post -b-father in law, nephew executed in 1020 -5-Katif of Vizier Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 14 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm -a-katif = scribe -6-died around 1056 -a-actions representative of J aristocrats -7-achieved a lot b/c -a-Kalifs = Ovaya's -i-strong, powerful, but stepped down in 11th cent. -b-warring factions -i-Ibn Shaprut able to negotiate bet. factions, which allowed SHN to rise -c-successful trade & commerce -d-diplomat, cultured -8-brilliant poet -a-great, Arabic style, caligraphy -9-knew atronomy -10-perushim on gem. -a-Shu"T -b-contact w/R' Hai Gaon -c-wanted to make sefer that was compendium of all halacha -i-not able to do so -11-military commander -a-poetry reflects battles -12-social & educational matters important -a-held educators to high, honest standards -13-harsh in rulings, later mellowed -14-enemies of Spain and J's own enemies -a-recog. Dangerous position of being involved in gov't & J at same time -b-always worried abt. conflict of interests -15-1056, son & community of Granada slaughtered on same day -a-showed connected to both J and Spain Jews in Xian Rome I. 312CE -Rome adopted Xianity A-pictured as cross wedding sword -1-Xians fought w/Rome to get them to recog. Them as legit relig. like J -a-religio ligita = legitimate religion -b-never gained that power -2-in 312, Xianity became official relig. of Rome -3-other classes of Rome accepted superficial Xianity -a-provided them w/ #'s B-Xian vs. Jews -1-already hated J from pagan days -2-Hadrianic and other wars diminished J's statue -3-J rejected, until 2nd coming of Yeshu, and then only maybe accepted -a-even if saved, cannot be redeemed now -4-single J incidents attributes to all J -5-Eusebius-distinction bet. Hebrews and Jews -a-Hebrews-neither J nor gentiles; had Xian values -b-Jews-followed Moshe, who created Jewry, w/laws that never had meaning for gentile -6-Torah had meaning only through Yeshu -a-said neviyim prophesied abt. Yeshu & New Torah--Torah Chaddasha -b-Maharal-will poskin like Shammai, certain changes in Halacha C-BHMK dest. & Impact on Jews -1-caused loss of esteem amongst goyim -2-Yavneh-interal & external threats -a-internal threats-Essenes, Kehuna Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 15 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm -b-external threats-other religs. -c-J sought to unify itself -i-exclusion of outside probs. -ii-inclusion of all inside probs. -d-Kehuna -a-pushed for re-est. of BHMK -b-RYbZ, RShbG made Yavneh center of relig. for B"D, p'skay halacha -3-R"H 31b -a-R' Yochanan-Kohanim should not duchan w/shoes on -i-Y? zecher lamikdash , to equate it to sanctity & k'dusha of Y'm -4-standardized t'filla -a-Rabban Gamliel-put 18 Brochos into davenning -5-halacha consolidated -a-RybZ, Rabban Gamliel, R' Akiva, R' Yehuda HaNassi parts of mishnah process -b-helped BN"Y sustain itself, esp. in galus D-J's in Rome -1-at first, didn't suffer violence, but were lower class -a-segregated, so as not to contaminate X -2-Emp. Constantine-loyalty to state = loyalty to X -a-How can J be tolerated if not loyal to X--must not be loyal to state? -3-Theodosian Code 415CE-issued under Emp. Theodosius II, who collected Roman laws from Constantine through his time (400's CE) -a-big changes in laws over one century: -4-Church Council of Elvira, 304 CE (b4 X accepted in Rome): 4 Laws -a-no intermarriage w/heretics or w/Jews -i-referred to X women and other relig. men -ii-punishment-woman's parents excommunicated for 5 years -iii-no J punished (indic. No power over J, only Xian) -b-Xian farmers forbidden from having crops blessed by J -i-Xians wanted crops to be blessed by J b/c had high regard for J, felt J close to G-d -ii-punishment-eviction from church -iii-had high regard for J's b/c church forbid them from going to J -c-social relations bet. J & X were extremely cordial -i-priests invited & accepted to eat w/Jews -ii-priests forbidden to eat with J -iii-punishment-priest excluded from communion until contamination passed -d-adultery w/ J or pagan women -i-punishment-eviction from church -5-Theodosian Code -a-intermarriage bet. J & X forbidden -i-penalty-death for both parties -b-apostasy-forbidden for X to become J -i-penalty-evicted from church -c-X leaders not wanted X to be servants to J -i-Emp. Forbid J to own X slaves often (ppl. never listened to them) -ii-punishment-death -d-J sent taxes to BHMK & later Nassi -i-afraid these $$ sent to Persia -ii-Theo ruled $ must be sent to X charities -iii-cut off from E"Y -6-J's escaped these rulings by converting -a-Theo ruled that cannot convert unless paid debts to church -b-J also wanted to prevent conversions -c-418 CE-death penalties ensued for converting w/o paying debts -7-Roman legislation Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 16 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman -a-anti-Semitism incorporated into state law -b-terminology for J: dismal, sachraligious Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm E-387 CE-Major Turning Point: Bishop of Antioch, John Chrysostom -1-issued 8 sermons totaling 100 pages -a-preached against J -b-known as Homilies Against the Jews -c-unlike Vacivious, ignorant of J -d-J posed no threat to X -e-wanted to inspire fear & hatred -2-set important precedent -a-X could write anything vs. J simply b/c were J -3-events of centuries ago- T'hillim 37: -a-sacrificed children -4-considered synagogues evil places -a-of X women who attended synagogue: -i-rej. X who attended shul b/c Bible there -ii-responded that Ark in Temple of Dagan -b-called J "demons who spout scriptures" -5-Easter held of Pesach -a-99% did celebrate it then -b-b/c killed Yeshu, X should say they hate us -6-anti-Semitism today: Cardinal Hay-Europe & Jews -a-writes abt. JChrysostom that was happy person, touched by divine -7-J & X of Antioch -a-knew one another, so not too successful -b-had much influence on later generations, who didn't know J -8-wanted to inspire fear & hatred, so accused of 5 things -a-deception-b-thievery-c-huxter-selling things for any price he can get -d-lustful-e-greedy-9-accused synagogue of 4 things -a-cavern of brigands -b-repair (lair) of wild beasts -c-place of shame & ridicule -d-domicile of devil -10-odorous J -a-b/c assassination of Yeshu -b-no indulgence, not pardon, forever damned -c-used metaphors, line of Tanach, to hurt J From Deiner in lieu of 2/16/00: 2/21/00 I. Takanos Rabbaynu Gershom, M'Or HaGola (10th-11th cent) A-Involved in textual correction of Gemara -1-travelled Europe finding manuscripts -a-examined and determined correct texts -2-Rashi and others disagreed with RGersh's girsas -a-many others had diff. girsaos -3-gathered talmidim, studied texts by rote memory until knew his correct text by heart -4-also gave him payrushim of words to explain text -a-sent talmidim out to communities, poskined like Rebbe, RGersh Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 17 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman B-Definition of Takana Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm -1-takana = din made by great individual -a-also requires community to go along with it -b-often instituted conference of gedolay Yisrael, rabbanim, to affirm takana -i-rabbanim then convinced own communities to follow ruling -2-put into cherem if violate -a-Ashkenaz upheld them, S'fardim did not C-Forbidding marrying more than one wife -1-debate whether accomplished anything -a-excepting S'fardim, lacked plural marriages -b-in Tanach, also in Gem happened occasionally -2-plural marriages not common problem in E"Y -a-Gem. R' Ami-cant add 2nd wife unless other wives agree -i-disputed, but shows tendency for monogamy -b-even Karaites said that could never marry 2nd wife from "achosah" -i-"achosah" = neighbor -3-lack actual text of takana -a-Rashi = first to mention it -4-later takana of other ruling making exceptions to takana -a-problem: have 3 versions of list of exceptions -5-takana versions: can only be matir it if have heter from... -a-100 men from 3 separate countries -b-100 men from 3 communities from 3 separate countries -i-accepted my many gedolim--said refers to the 3 major communities in Germ. -ShU"M--Spire, Worms, Mayence -ii-Y these? For these communities that R'Gersh made it for -c-100 men from 3 countries from 3 communities -6-problems with accepting 2nd version -a-if need approval of community, Y require 100 men? -b-not likely that takana for 3 specific communities would spread to all communities -c-Spire began 1080CE--couldn't have been included b/c 50 years after his death -7-R' Meir M'Padua (Acharon) said that R' Shimshon b. Avraham of Sans (Rash M'Shantz) made takana -a-Rashba-R' Shlomo b. Aderes-said takana lapsed in 5000 (1240 CE) -b-RMP said that Rash M'Shantz made it diff., renewed it -c-Rashba needs verification-not found in any of his 6,000 t'shuvos, chiddushim -d-R' Yosef of Kolon (Maharik)-1500's-T'shuva 101 quotes Rashba as saying this -i-but authority of Rashba indefinite, not sure how Rashba knew this -e-even if Rashba correct, no German or French Rishonim discuss lapse of takana or time limit to it -8-no evidence that original takana had limitations -a-later gatherings could ammend it -9-suspension of takana: case of wife leaving husband for baptism -a-nobody held that husband obligated to her -b-usually happened b/c wife had affair w/knights or noblemen -c-investigated what happened w/wife, allowed him to remarry after found that willingly converted to Xianity -d-had to show not forced baptism -10-case of Austria-demand that husband execute a get when wife ran away w/noble -a-accepted for wife for shaliach B"D -b-difficult case b/c B"D can only appoint Shaliach Holacha, not M'Kabel -c-able to b/c Zakin l'adam shelo b'fanav--b/c act of z'nus, and this freed her from it -11-problem of yibum when yavam already married -a-no problem in France b/c only Chalitza done -b-Germ-forbid yibbum, and here perform chalitza--compelled yavam to do chalitza in this case Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 18 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm -c-R' Ya'akov Molin-1500's-wrote on minhagim-allowed yibum in these cases -i-cases not nec. accepted although in t'shvos -12-Rashba-280-S'fardim forced Ashkenaz ppl. to hold like takana when lived amongst them -a-however, allowed a man married to a wife for 10 years & childless to marry 2nd wife -b-Ravya-disagreed w/allowance -c-Or Zarua-chided BNY to hold to D'rabbanan's as well as they did the takana D-R'Gersh not always accepted easily, w/o approval of other gedolim -1-t'shuva R' Yitzchak M'Vina--sh'ayla abt. bris on R"H -a-R' Gersh's opinion not accepted until 4 other gedolim agreed w/him E-Takkana-Compulsory Divorce -1-generally husband gives divorce -a-B"D could force husband to divorce her if refuses -b-if he wanted to divorce, B"D couldn't stop him -c-Chazal assumed that payment of k'suba normally prevented divorce -i-really only protected poor -ii-Josephus-avg. worker made 8 zuz yearly; k'suba cost 200 zuz! -d-sometimes, woman's family added Tosefes over 200 zuz to prevent wealthier husbands from divorcing 2/23/00 -2-if woman wants divorce, woman comes and B"D researches, determines she deserves divorce -a-husband could be forced -3-R'Gersh put issur on giving get w/o communities consent -a-can't throw get into chatzer of woman w/o consent of 3 communities -b-if husband did it anyway, he and witnesses put into nidduy (for 30 days) -4-later generations nullified get given w/o consent of communities -a-Gem. Kesubos allowed this -b-R'Gersh didn't take this power for self through takkanos -c-husband could not remarry -ii-husband didn't have to provide m'zonos -5-Gaonim also made similar takkana -a-husband could be forced to give get -b-contradicted Gemara--community had no power to stop husband giving a get -6-results -a-easier for wife to force husband to give get than husband to divorce wife -7-neither text of Divorce or Bigamy takkana available F-Takkana-Engagements (have text) -1-in monogamous society, not only involves social equality of the chassan & kallah, but also the families -2-families considered on same social status level -a-through WWI, social status more important than other factors -b-wealth, son/daughter of talmid chacham -c-shaloch manos-lower family HAD to send higher family, who can then choose respond -3-actual takkana: shidduchim-difficult to break -a-each party gave $ to trustees, forfeit to losing party if broke agreement -b-also took on Cherem if broke it -c-if break engagement, ppl. hurt b/c thought to have left b/c other was lower social class -4-Charamim didn't work -a-communities used to annul Charamim -5-Maharam M'Rotenbrg (Modechai Niddah p. 788)-case -a-chassan became apostate after engagement -b-ruled that kallah could re-engage to another man -c-however, if chassan returned to Judaism, and if kallah not engaged yet, she'd have to take him back -d-this applied unless 30 ppl. were matir it after investigation -6-weak proof of engagement ceremonies: Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 19 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman -a-German Yiddish expression for engagement: "K'nas Laygan" -b-to put a fine on the parties Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm G-Takkana-Privacy of Mail -1-since no governmental post office was by foot -a-letter-carriers were curious -b-charem (inc. taking shavua, like all charamim) put on reading letters -2-assur to read letter w/o author's knowledge or permission H-Takkana (?)-Amending Text of Gemara -1-Source: R"T in intro to Sefer HaYashar -a-reports that R'Gersh "lot" (cursed) those who changed text of Talmud -2-R'Gersh very meticulous in researching proper texts of Gem -a-even R"T does not say made actual takkana -3-Tosefos engaged in amending texts -a-some even put own girsa into Gem text -b-possible that these Gedolim violated Takkana?!!? -i-difficult to assert I-Takkana-Rights of Transients through Communities w/Cherem of D"B -1-person passes through town w/cherem -a-is brought to court and is tried -b-cherem applied to passer-by -c-could go to B"D and present own case -d-"witnesses only for deceivers" -2-passerbys have rights of community he's in -3-visiting defendant only had to be present for case -a-could then leave -b-witnesses had to run after him to give him p'sak din J-Takkana-Bringing Recalcitrant Defendant to B"D -1-if claimant take Jew to B"D, and he refuses to appear, claimant has ability to stop t'fillos and announce to public that wants B"D to hear his case -a-which davenning can claimant stop? -b-how many k'hillos can he stop? -2-cannot stop during Yotzer HaM'oros, Mincha, Krias HaTorah until stops Ma'ariv or Ashray/Uva L'Tziyon 3 times -a-can do this as many times as wants until B"D hears his case -b-cannot stop any other shul aside from defendant's shul 3 consecutive times -i-can then go to other shul -3-full stopping of t'filla -a-prevent starting Ma'ariv -b-can interrupt t'filla until k'hilla grants a din Torah -c-later became common to stop t'filla during K'rias HaTorah K-Regulations for Establishing New Communities -1-had to make sure their actions not conflicting with other communities 3/1/00 Europe: Germany & France A-Later, by 8th cent, all over Europe B-Machir I. Jews Settled in Europe by 4th cent. -1-outstanding talmid chachom -2-scholarly decendents called `nisiyim' -a-some headed school of Narbonne, Fr. C-Yehuda b. Meir HaKohen Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 20 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman -1-called Leontine (from Latin term for lion) -2-refered to in Sefer HaYashar of R"T -a-called him a gaon -3-teacher of Rabbanu Gershom Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm D-General Non-Jewish Learning (by 8th-10th cent.) -1-learning limited to clergy, became scholars -2-clergy became statesman -a-recognized that Jews nec. for economic stability -b-Jews served as middle class -3-allowed Jes to serve as domestic traders & merchants -4-Spire, on Rhine River -a-feudal town, w/bishop as direct ruler -b-Germ emp. Ruled nominally E-Bishop Rudiger-ambitious leader of Spire (1073-1090) -1-wanted to enlarge rule -2-riot vs. Jews broke out in Mayence during his rule -a-many angry -3-BishRud realized this was opportunity to invite Jews to Spire -4-Invitation had 3 parts: -a-Jews could live w/relig. freedom from gov't, clergy -b-J had right to serve as merchants -i-important, b/c usually goyim got angry when J merchants prospered -c-told Jews that dignity of spire would increase 1000-fold w/them there -5-received decree of Henry IV, emp. Germ. -a-allowed J to live, work there, under protection -b-gave J right of mobility, to travel in & out of Spire w/o problems -c-Tos.(B"K )& Ran (Nedarim 28 in Mesores HaShas) -gov't had formerly said that J had to take shavua abt. not leaving area -i-said J would add word "hayom" silently F-Culture -1-no ties bet. J & Xian studies -a-Xian scholars all clergy -b-studied only Xian stuff -2-J spoke vernacular Fr., German -a-not noble lang. -3-studied Hebrew studies -a-Tanach } -b-Gemara } studied heavily by Germ, Fr -c-Ivrit } -d-Poetry -studied by Spanish -4-Many J studied, not limited to J rabbis -5-R' Yehuda HaKohen, R' Eliezer of Worms (author of Kol Bo) wrote: -a-in Kol Bo: young men (ketanim) should listen to gedolim, b/c they increased more than ignorant ppl. G-Increase in Learning: -1-Kolonimous Family-1sy family of scholars -a-came of own volition -2-son, R' Yehoshua Kolonimous, -a-wrote Ashkenaz piyutim, minhagim of Sprie, Mayence -3-sources for coming to Worms -a-R' Eliezer of Worms-wrote _______ -b-R' Shlomo b. Luria (MaHarShal)-4-have 60 t'shuvus -a-his advice sought by many ppl. -b-wrote abt. social & economic inyanim Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 21 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman H-R' Yehuda b. Meir HaKohen (Leontine) Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm -1-teacher of R'Gersh, who said taught him `rov talmudi' -a-discussion in Gem. Bavli Abt. Rebbe Muvhak-rov chochmaso =most of quantitative learning -b-Gem. Yerush says abt. teaching derech halimud -2-worked in Mayence after Kolonimus -3-p'sak: t'shuvos Ma'asay HaGeonim-said permissible to eulogize Talmid Chocham on Chanukah -a-already says this in Mo'ed Kattan -b-was controvercial at the time -4- p'sak: found in Or Zarua: in name of Leontine-a-sh'mitas kesafim -5- p'sak: Sha'ary Dura-in name of RYbM Ka"tz (Kohen Tzeddek) -a-wanted to forbid even b'di eved: cooking w/goyish kugel -6-have only 1 intact Shu"t -a-detailed analysis of aspects of community law, majority rule of corporate bodies -b-not exactly shutafos -c-discusses modern democratic rule there J-R' Shimon b. Yitzchak -1-from Lamanes -2-from chevra inc. R' Eliezer K-Machir b. Yehuda, bro. of R'Gersh -1-wrote 2 books: -a-Sefer Machiri -b-lost 2nd book: Sefer Alph Bais shel Machir -i-Rashi mentions it in Bereayshis 43:11, Eruvin 22a s.v. `Kormi' -ii-hypothesis-could have been dictionary L-Misc. -1-R' Ya'akov b. Yashar -2-R' Yosef b. Shmuel ???? Bon Fer -a-born in Larbonne -b-Rav in Limoge -c-wrote many t'shuvos -d-lost commentary -e-fixed texts -f-wrote Hilchos G'dolos -g-paytan -i-62 of his piyutim important in -ii-Elokay HaRuchos on Shabbos HaGadol -3-R' Simcha b. Yitzchak Abun -a-in court of Fr. -b-persuades Henry to not exile J of Mayence -c-paytan-wrote Baruch HASHEM Yom Yom Parshanut I. 2 approaches: P'shat vs. Drash A-Menachem b. Chelbo-p'shat -1-Menachem b. Sarut, Dunash ibn. Labrat -2-wirtings lost -3-rationalist B-Moshe HaDarshan & Shimon Kara-drash -1-SK = brother of Mencham ibn Sarut -2-drush = allegorical interpretation, mishalim -3- Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 22 of 23 JHI 1300 Medieval Jewish History Professor Landman C-Yosef b. Shimon Kara-pashtan -1-Ki L'Navi HaYom...indic. Shmuel was written after time of death -a-HaRo'eh-Shmuel still called Ro'eh-seer -b-P'sukim state that Navi used to be called ro'eh Spring 2000 Notes until Midterm The Crusades The Popes The Rishonim The Maimonidean Controversy Franco-German Jewry The Marranos Downloaded from: www.yumesorah.com JHI1300LanNotesMidterm1.pdf Page 23 of 23 ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/17/2008 for the course JEWISH HIS 1300 taught by Professor Lan during the Spring '08 term at Yeshiva.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online