Unformatted text preview: evidence used against Rochin a. Police Officers b. the district court of appeal determined that the officers were “guilty of unlawfully breaking into and entering defendant’s room and were guilty of unlawfully assaulting and battering defendant while in the room they were also guilty of unlawfully assaulting, bettering, torturing and falsely imprisoning the defendants at the hospital c. Due Process Clause V. Holding VI. Opinion a. Majority Opinion: The way the officers got the evidence was wrong. The officers illegally broke in to his home, opened his mouth, and illegally obtained the contents in his stomach b. Dissenting Opinion: c. Concurrence: They agreed that it was wrong but the reason it was wrong because it was a violation of the bill of rights more than a violation of the due process clause VII. Judgments: Reversed...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 04/17/2008 for the course CRJ 205 taught by Professor Neilson during the Spring '08 term at Ivy Tech Community College.
- Spring '08