Course Hero Logo

assign 4.docx - Owen Arnett 11-7-2021 BA-226 Assignment #4...

Course Hero uses AI to attempt to automatically extract content from documents to surface to you and others so you can study better, e.g., in search results, to enrich docs, and more. This preview shows page 1 out of 1 page.

Owen Arnett11-7-2021BA-226Assignment #41.After losing the lower court case, the plaintiff appeals. The case is then taken to theSupreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. In this court, the contract is found binding. Thecontract was no doubt a serious offer by the plaintiff, but the defendant claims heaccepted jokingly. This is found to be irrelevant since the contract was legally bindingbetween both parties.2.
End of preview. Want to read the entire page?

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

Term
Winter
Professor
N/A
Tags
Contract Law, Supreme Court of the United States, Appellate court

Unformatted text preview: contract was written correctly. The defendant showed the intent to sell at the time regardless of what he says now, and the signing of the contract proves this. The contract includes sale of the land for fifty-thousand dollars, examination of the title and nothing saying the defendant can back out or take back the land. The conversation also began before drinking, and the defendant expresses interest in selling the land the entire time for the offer of $50,000....
View Full Document

Newly uploaded documents

Show More

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture