Chap 1 The Number System

imply respectively the two conditions piw1 and piw2

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: m ≤ n, then p(n) is true in particular, so it follows from (PIW2) that p(n + 1) is true, and this gives (PIS2). It now follows from (PIS) that p(n) is true for every n ∈ N. ((PIW) ⇒ (PIS)) Suppose that (PIS1) and (PIS2) both hold for a statement p(.). Consider a statement q (.), where q (n) denotes the statement p(m) is true for every m ≤ n. Chapter 1 : The Number System page 5 of 19 First Year Calculus c W W L Chen, 1982, 2005 Then the two conditions (PIS1) and (PIS2) for the statement p(.) imply respectively the two conditions (PIW1) and (PIW2) for the statement q (.). It follows from (PIW) that q (n) is true for every n ∈ N, and this clearly implies that p(n) is true for every n ∈ N. We next discuss the completeness of the real numbers in greater detail. First of all, the Completeness axiom can be stated in the following alternative way. COMPLETENESS AXIOM. Suppose that S is a non-empty set of real numbers and S is bounded above. Then there is a real number M ∈ R satisfying the following two conditions: (S1) For every x ∈ S , the inequality x ≤ M holds. (S2) For every > 0, there e...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/01/2009 for the course MATH 2343124 taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '08 term at UCSD.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online