Unformatted text preview: Supreme Court. This means in Christophers case he is obligated to show his tattoo to the court for identification purposes. 2. This type of in court identification would not violate Christophers constitutional rights because it is not a matter of testimonial or communicative response. Self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment is defined as a testimonial or communicative response that is incriminating....
View Full Document
- Spring '08
- communicative response, legitimate avenue, Obadele Brown