{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Tut 3 Soln e-Learning_13092013085622591

# Tut 3 Soln e-Learning_13092013085622591 - ST3131 Regression...

This preview shows pages 1–8. Sign up to view the full content.

ST3131 Regression Analysis AY21013/14 Semester 1 Tutorial 3 ST3131 Regression Analysis CYM 1

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
Question 1 (i) 𝑋𝑋𝑋 = 𝑛 𝑥 1𝑖 𝑖 𝑥 2𝑖 𝑖 𝑥 1𝑖 𝑖 𝑥 1𝑖 2 𝑖 𝑥 1𝑖 𝑥 2𝑖 𝑖 𝑥 2𝑖 𝑖 𝑥 1𝑖 𝑥 2𝑖 𝑖 𝑥 2𝑖 2 𝑖 = 11 66 22 66 506 346 22 346 484 and 𝑋𝑋𝑦 = 𝑦 𝑖 𝑖 𝑥 1𝑖 𝑦 𝑖 𝑖 𝑥 2𝑖 𝑦 𝑖 𝑖 = 33 85 142 CYM 2 ST3131 Regression Analysis
Question 1 (i) The least squares estimate 𝛽 ̂ = 𝑋𝑋𝑋 −1 𝑋𝑋𝑦 It is given that 𝑋𝑋𝑋 −1 = 1 28644 125188 24332 11704 24332 4840 2354 11704 2354 1210 Hence 𝛽 ̂ = 1 28644 125188 24332 11704 24332 4840 2354 11704 2354 1210 33 85 142 = 14.0 2.0 0.5 That is, 𝛽 ̂ 0 = 14.0, 𝛽 ̂ 1 = 2.0, and 𝛽 ̂ 3 = 0.5 CYM 3 ST3131 Regression Analysis

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
Question 1 (ii) Test H 0 : 𝛽 1 = 𝛽 2 = 0 (i.e. 𝑦 = 𝛽 0 + 𝜖 ) against H 1 : 𝛽 1 0 and/or 𝛽 2 0 (i.e. 𝑦 = 𝛽 0 + 𝛽 1 𝑥 1 + 𝜖 or 𝑦 = 𝛽 0 + 𝛽 2 𝑥 2 + 𝜖 or 𝑦 = 𝛽 0 + 𝛽 1 𝑥 1 + 𝛽 2 𝑥 2 + 𝜖 Let 𝐹 = 𝑀𝑀𝑅 𝑀𝑀𝑀 Reject H 0 at the 5% significance level if the observed F -value > F 0.05 (2,8) = 4.46 (or p-value < 0.05) CYM 4 ST3131 Regression Analysis
Question 1 (ii) From the data, we have SST = 𝑦 𝑖 2 𝑖 − 𝑛𝑦 2 = 289 – 11(3) 2 = 190 with 10 d.f. SSR = 𝛽 ̂ 𝑋𝑋𝑦 − 𝑛𝑦 2 =122 with 2 d.f. SSE = SST – SSR = 68 with 8 d.f. CYM 5 ST3131 Regression Analysis

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
Question 1 (ii) We summarize the results in the following ANOVA table ANOVA table Since F obs = 7.176 > F 0.05 (2,8) = 4.46 (or p -value < 0.05), we conclude that the overall regression is statistically significant. CYM 6 ST3131 Regression Analysis Source SS d.f. MS F -ratio p -value Regression 122 2 61 7.176 0.0164 Error 68 8 8.5 Total 190 10
Question 1 (iii) 𝑅 2 = 𝑟 𝑦⋅12 2 = 𝑀𝑀𝑅 𝑀𝑀𝑆 = 122 190 = 0.6421 About 64% of the variation in Y is explained by x 1 and x 2 .

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.