evidence_outline_borenstein_summer06

evidence_outline_borenstein_summer06 - Evidence Outline...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Evidence Outline Borenstein / Summer 2006 EVIDENCE OUTLINE: TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF RELEVANCE ........................................................................................................... 1 P ROBATIVENESS AND M ATERIALITY .........................................................................................................1 FRE 401: Definition of “Relevant Evidence”....................................................................................................1 FRE 401 Notes...................................................................................................................................................1 FRE 402: Evidence Generally Admissible; Irrelevant Evidence Inadmissible..............................................1 U.S. v. James (9th Cir., 1999)...........................................................................................................................1 C ONDITIONAL R ELEVANCE ....................................................................................................................2 FRE 104(b): Relevancy Conditioned on Fact....................................................................................................2 Advisory Committee Notes.................................................................................................................................3 Cox v. State (Sup. Ct. of Indiana, 1998)............................................................................................................3 P ROBATIVENESS V ERSUS THE R ISK OF U NFAIR P REJUDICE .............................................................................3 FRE 403: Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of Prejudice, Confusion, or Waste of Time..........3 Advisory Committee Notes.................................................................................................................................3 FRE 403 Notes...................................................................................................................................................3 State v. Bocharski (Sup Ct. of AZ, 2001)...........................................................................................................3 U.S. v. Meyers (5th Cir., 1978)..........................................................................................................................5 1. FROM THE D’ S BEHAVIOR TO FLIGHT ;.............................................................................................................5 2. FROM FLIGHT TO CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT ;.....................................................................................................5 3. FROM CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT TO CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT CONCERNING THE CRIME...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/18/2008 for the course LAW 101 taught by Professor Vark during the Spring '08 term at Uni. Tartu.

Page1 / 35

evidence_outline_borenstein_summer06 - Evidence Outline...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online