The Psychology of Art Pt5

The Psychology of - The Psychology of Art Past Present Future OPPOSITION TO SCIENCE An interest in the two main types of aesthetic phenomena

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: The Psychology of Art: Past, Present, Future OPPOSITION TO SCIENCE An interest in the two main types of aesthetic phenomena, artistic creation and appreciation, was shown in early Greek poetry and philosophy. Why, then, did it take so long to develop a scientific approach to them? The answer lies mainly in the slow achievement of the scientific attitude and method in general, especially in the humanistic fields. The dominant approaches were those of religious mysticism and metaphysical absolutism. Early attempts at an empirical, naturalistic approach, like that of Lucretius, were beaten down repeatedly. The old, anti-scientific attitudes persisted in aesthetics through the Renaissance and up to the present time. Any talk of scientific method in the study of art still meets determined resistance from influential scholars as well as from artists and the general public. The origin of psychological theorizing about the arts can be traced to the widespread primitive belief in the supernatural power and inspiration of the artist. It was thought that some artists, like shamans, priests, and oracles, could be divinely power and inspiration of the artist....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/19/2008 for the course PSYCHOLOGY Psy of Art taught by Professor Stanford during the Fall '07 term at Franklin CH.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online