Bhe and Others v Magistrate, Khayelitsha and Others; Shibi v Sithole and Others;SA Human Rights Commission and Another v President of the RSA and Another2005 (1) BCLR 1 (CC)Division:Constitutional CourtDate:15/10/2004Case No:CCT49/03, CCT69/03, CCT50/03Before:AL Chaskalson, Chief Justice; PN Langa, Deputy Chief Justice; TH Madala, YMokgoro, ED Moseneke, S Ngcobo, CME O’Regan, AL Sachs, TL Skweyiya, ZMYacoob and J van der Westhuizen, Justices•Editor’s Summary•Cases Referred to•Judgment•Administration of Estates –intestate succession – Blacks –section 23of the BlackAdministration Act38 of 1927declared unconstitutional and invalid – Regulations for theAdministration and Distribution of the Estates of Deceased Blacks (R200) published inGovernment Gazette No. 10601 dated 6 February 1987 declared unconstitutional andinvalid – rule of male primogeniture as it applies in African customary law to theinheritance of property declared to be unconstitutional and invalid to the extent that itexcludes or hinders women and extra-marital children from inheriting property –section1(4)(b)of the Intestate Succession Act81 of 1987declared unconstitutional and invalid –section 1of the Intestate Succession Act81 of 1987to apply to intestate deceasedestates that would formerly have been governed bysection 23of the Black AdministrationAct38 of 1927subject to certain rules.African customary law– constitutional obligation to develop African customary law andstatus of customary law – discussed in general.Blacks– succession – intestate succession –section 23of the Black Administration Act38of 1927declared unconstitutional and invalid – Regulations for the Administration andDistribution of the Estates of Deceased Blacks (R200) published in Government GazetteNo. 10601 dated 6 February 1987 declared unconstitutional and invalid – rule of maleprimogeniture as it applies in African customary law to the inheritance of property declaredto be unconstitutional and invalid to the extent that it excludes or hinders women andextra-maritalchildrenfrominheritingproperty–section1(4)(b)oftheIntestateSuccession Act81 of 1987declared unconstitutional and invalid –section 1of theIntestate Succession Act81 of 1987to apply to intestate deceased estates that wouldformerly have been governed bysection 23of the Black Administration Act38 of1927subject to certain rules.