COM 200 Notes Days 6 and 7

COM 200 Notes Days 6 and 7 - COM 200 Communication Theory...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
COM 200 Communication Theory Prof. Steven Lemley Spring 2008 1/28/08 -Expectancy Violations Theory (EVT); Judy Burgoon - Non-Verbal Communication -You cannot no communicate - 70 % of communication is non-verbal - Edward Hall—Proxemics “The Silent Language” - he wrote about American preference for distance in communication; each culture has its own proxemic preferences and if you are traveling to another culture, learn their proxemic preferences for different types of relationships and interactions -Intimate - 0—18 inches -Personal - 18inches—4 feet -Social - 4 feet—10 feet -Public - 10ft+ -EVT -Personal Space Preferences - the “invisible bubble” around a person - violating someone’s personal space causes a response in which the “victim” considers the relationship; decide whether the violation is good or bad -Expectancy (research weak) - the distance which is predicted and desired; expectancy determines response So: -context: -where, why, how the interaction takes place. You might be more tolerant of someone you don’t know coming close if they do it in public - Relationship: -are you familiar with this person? Do you like the person? Is this person lower/ higher in status? - Communicator Characteristics - personality - demographics: gender, age, appearance *avuncular: “of or relating to an uncle” a person like this will habitually act like your uncle; give advice, contact, etc.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
-Expectancy Violation Valence: the importance we assign to violation, its significance. Cost—reward= value -Interpret/Evaluate -Ok? More. Not ok? Less. - Ambiguous? - Communiator Reward Valence - likely gains + losses - Positive and negative attributes - social context rules the decision - to accept - to violate (if the relationship will be improved by re-evaluating) - Interaction Adaptation Theory - Predisposition to adapt
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.
  • Spring '08
  • Barrientos
  • Interpersonal relationship, interaction adaptation theory, Communication Theory Prof., Boundary Linkage Boundary, relationship development theory

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 6

COM 200 Notes Days 6 and 7 - COM 200 Communication Theory...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online