Social psyc textbook summary chap 12, Law

Social psyc textbook summary chap 12, Law - Chapter 12 Law...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Chapter 12 Law 421-426 Process of a crime:- Crime is detected and reported- Investigation may lead to a suspect, suspect is arrested- Suspect is jailed or bail is set, courts decide if there is sufficient evidence for formal accusation- Crown counsel and defense lawyers gather evidence in process called discovery- If a deal is not negotiated, case goes to trial o Trials are infrequent o Threat of trial motivates parties to gather evidence and negotiate deal - Conviction, then sentencing, and then possibility of appeal Jury Selection- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms o Innocent until proven guilty, right to trial within reasonable time, right to a jury trial Voir Dire- Jury selection 3 stage process: o 1) Sheriffs office contacts eligible jurors (voter registration lists) o 2) people randomly drawn from list to give a random sample from community Screening process officially known as voir dire Lawyers accept juror, or can challenge (reject) them Each side has a limited number of peremptory challenges they dont need a reason to reject a juror Unlimited challenges for cause juror thought to be biased and subsequently tested and may be excused Trial Lawyers as Intuitive Psychologists - Lawyers may rely on implicit personality theories and stereotypes o Implicit personality theory: set of assumptions about how certain attributes are related to each other and to behavior o Stereotype when people think all members of a group share same attributes- Some lawyers claim that they can predict a jurors verdict based on demographics o Research shows demographics do not consistently predict verdicts o Research shows jurors with authoritarian personality identify with figures of authority, punitive and intolerant of nonconventional others are prone to convict o Lawyers cannot effectively predict how jurors will vote- Study : Norbert Kerr tested whether jurors favor defendants who are similar to themselves o Mixed-race groups with a strong or weak case and black or white defendant o When evidence is weak, more lenient in verdicts towards defendant of same race o When evidence is strong, harsher against similar defendant Distancing themselves from his wrongdoing- Study : Sommers and Ellsworth tested if race would matter for crimes that involved race and racism o When race was a prominent issue at trial, white jurors did not want to appear racist and did not discriminate o When race was not an overt issue, whites did not care about appearing racist, and treated white defendant more favorably than black defendant- Study : Mitchell, Haw, Pfeifer, Meissner defined racial bias as negative treatment of a member of an outgroup...
View Full Document

Page1 / 14

Social psyc textbook summary chap 12, Law - Chapter 12 Law...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online