This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Exam : 165 MATH 2451 thq_05 TC Use
Course : Multivariable Calculus Due Date : 20990204 (Wed) Instructor : McCary KEZ (First Name) (Last Name) 20160212 16:21 (10 points} Find all values of a and b which make the function differentiable at. all points. You must. use left. and right. 1.
limits, the limit. deﬁnition of continuity at. a point, and the limit. deﬁnition of derivative at. a point. a332+bx+4 3:32
J60”):
(133+?) I>2 1H5; Fuumonl :5 9L; (lair: Even/WHERE EXCEPT foééwb/ 96:3, 5/0 PIECES A212
POLY§. F012 SE Ar 99:52,) NEED: (m)= (M an
ﬁéx‘tmey’) = EQEGME) = ﬂaw we 7la+ll+¢ = «CZ/Mb
Qa+b+tf : o Foe {Iii AT ¢6=.2) a! 1%) = xx»:
Jfg”; (QMHLJ) : {66:54 (0‘)
fa+b = a 3a+b = O Cox/191mm» mesa mthrronc, 2. (10 points} {a} Compute using the limit deﬁnition of partial derivative. (b) Compute using the limit deﬁnition of partial derivative. {c} Show f is not continuous at 3: _ I my (.3 0 otherwise _ [430 ‘77—
., mm (s)
4:) ‘ “Lg? Lb ll
0 @ jzmx PAW F0 (g) .3 LIMI’r 02m” 0N P/‘r’rH ‘ LIMIT ,. DNE
NM g2! The purpose of this exercise is to illustrate )ne of the weaknesses of partial derivatives: even if all partials exist at
a point, the function may still be discontinuous! This is in contrast to scalar calculus where the existence of 9’01}
implies continuity at a. See the comment about symbolic calculators at the end of the next exercise, which also holds
for this exercise. 3. (10 points} Find 82f and 82f using the limit deﬁnition of partial derivative. a a?! a 593N933 (93:69};
2 .2 . _. '3 PARTI/HJ
I _ lava$2341?) 7&0 > Foe THE 9/ MIXED I _ n I t: 93(0 =u<3—i((o)+m)g§(%)
. O . erw l‘ne 9x 0) hr)" kl __.—
AT (9‘); 5’ 1» sawo
j 0K)  l’WO k
'0 \~ 0 u
Jam ¥((°ll(ad ’ " >  < kgi_o 143:0 l!»  M90 h
J» L 3’0) M L.
= w v» (7)
— M r) 4 L1
. o Noﬂm J» awnaw)
9 M M 99693 ‘7 Pm k
i M l’ ,u sumo
952(6) = o W k )
' k“ In.
W 9:? ‘ 9L +4941 9'
’9'” W 2 (a
2i : (ml4x1 91 K
9” (maul : 1
40 (um: 9. m 9: 6o
0—19 _ —”;§—#) 9 09
axill WM gjgxm 7; ago)
0 orMERwICIE
) WH)’ DOES ms WT WNW/(Um cum/1W3 macaw?
(with; 9._ or i _ iﬁzér) a
7M ' (K m
j 0 otMEtheg The purpose of this exercise is to show that mixed partials in different orders are not always equal. Don’t get lost in
the limit formalism try plotting f and its ﬁrst and second partials on W'olfram Alpha (or, even better, download
SAGE Math and start using it, MATH majors}. Can you see why the mixed partials are not equal? Feel free to use a
symbolic calculator to compute the partials of f away from 6, but remember that you must use the limit deﬁnition
to compute the partials at [5 because [5 is not in the domain of that rational expression. 4. (10 points} Compute the Jacobian. You must. Show your work and not. use a symbolic calculator. (a)
I cos(3:}
f = 332?} + :92
‘ 5111032 — M (04) 0
[if = M5 06””‘5
(MW9) m m4 (“’45)
(b)
I /I2 + 92
9(a) = ' (5111(I39D2
% ’21— .24—
[TW] = W
'x.
3 w (W)? (MW) 9 WW “W” °‘ 5. (10 points} Let = Show, using limits, that for any number m, lim (f([}+ h} — m} —m h) = n (1) 31—30 but lim 100a} + h} — fan — m a) = f} (93 31—30 is never true: there is no m such that m h is a good approximation to the increment Af at f}. Fm m NR (90
J/W‘;<Iul~ioIW‘ ‘>0
AM“ MDT?
A>o 
M(iﬂm\=1—wx "” 1)”
Imo“ V”
Am:
Jlm =4m —>
1 =1 IS Fifi/‘35 \I m
a" ‘LIMTT (9.} D.NE. WV» Tug; exeamg 6mm; WW THERE «:5 No LINEAR FuNLTIo'J or 1m; maewsm wurcn MppoxtMMES lad AT 0) Em: a
mow." tr Is US NEW. m,uo
WI
(75
MW)\i WI.) N0 DOB; LIMIT (:0 weak? “0) 3/0 THEQE 139 ND WI who” 246.22% V/ LE MEIR 0 M»
1/55 ruwe ME 0mm MOT£OM5 as Danni/“IVE WHERE N“)
Is DIN—,7 4V”: ,4; A WEN DearujTIUE, BUT [46) :5 N07— Vwa‘W FR’ELHET DIFF Does LIMIT (4) weak? ﬁg 7 Vin) THE/I MIQBEAT 0.
The purpose of this exercise is to wean you off of the scalar calculus deﬁnition of derivative and to get you accustomed
to the Fréchet deﬁnition. ...
View
Full Document
 Spring '09
 EYDELZON

Click to edit the document details