This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: acTviTes/history-brown-v-board-educaTon-re-enactment Yes because the arTcle uses facts from the events that led up to the case and he case itself. Yes it was wri±en in 2006 It is Unbiased because the arTcle states the facts and events that led up to this case. Yes because the arTcle comes from e very reliable internet source. Yes Loving v. Virginia (1967) h±p://www.nyTmes.co m/2008/05/14/opinion/ 14wed4.html?_r=0 Yes because the arTcle explained how the case came to be about and what happened. Yes it was wri±en in 2008 Its biased because the author does share his opinion. Such as” Court ruling underscored the stupidity and unfairness of segregaTon” Yes because the new York Tmes is well known Yes Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Yes because there are citaTons from Yes it was published in Its unbiased because the arTcle uses facts and notes Yes because Yes htps://www.law.cornell. edu/supremecourT/TexT/ 13-1314 similar cases To supporT This one. 2015 The auThor works for This...
View Full Document
- Spring '16