This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: h±p://www.pbs.org/wn et/supremecourt/rights/ landmark_brown.html Yes because the arTcle uses facts from other sources/documents . Yes it was wri±en in 2006 It is Biased because the author shares his opinions Yes because this is what the author does for a living Yes Loving v. Virginia (1967) h±p://www.nyTmes.co m/2008/05/14/opinion/ 14wed4.html?_r=0 Yes because the arTcle explained how the case came to be about and what happened. Yes it was wri±en in 2008 Its biased because the author does share his opinion. Such as” Court ruling underscored the stupidity and unfairness of segregaTon” Yes because the new York Tmes is well known Yes Arizona State Legislature Yes because there Yes it was Its unbiased because the Yes Yes v. Arizona htps://www.law.cornell. edu/supremecourT/TexT/ 13-1314 are ciTa±ons from similar cases To supporT This one. published in 2015 ar±cle uses facTs and noTes because The auThor works for This...
View Full Document
- Spring '16
- English, Supreme Court rulings, Arizona State Legislature, Jordi Avila