Unformatted text preview: When the ²ourth Circuit Court adopted the sliding scale model to determine jurisdic±on, the court can make the determina±on based on the type and frequency of interac±on over the internet. Based on the fact that there was clear intent by the defendant to do business in the state of Maryland, this allowed for the Long Arm statute to be extended to the ²lorida defendant. Ques±on 2) Did defendant Banks act ethically in this case? The defendant did not act ethically in this case. It is apparent that the defendant infringed on the trademarks that were registered to the plain±³, Chanel, Inc. A´er reviewing the case in the Maryland District Court database, the defendant never submiµed a response nor did she appear at any of the hearings which led to a default judgement on behalf of the plain±³....
View Full Document
- Fall '15
- Business Law, U.S. state, Florida defendant, Sue Case