PoliticsMarch 4 - principles even after our leader has...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Politics March 4, 2008 Neo classical view vs. protestant vs. catholic Machiavelli (Mack) – the politician who seeks to do good has got to be bad to do good - theres a difference between excusing an act and justifying it - excuse doesn’t erase the fact that it was a misdeed Utilitarian reasoning: Torture can be justified Walzer – the good prince has to learn not to be good - there needs to be externalization of moral burden with penance - we need to preserve some moral principles that remain moral
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: principles even after our leader has violated them Weber - we want a leader who will do the bad shit for us but still have a heavy moral conscious bout it-the ethical politician is the one whos willing to do whats necessary but doesnt justify the act and acknowledges the wrongness of the thing-we want them to know that the act might not work out in their favour and they might lose their glory but theyve already lost their moral character-entirely inward burden...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online