Q3.PT4.PR1.pdf - PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1, ( 11 Jupiter)...

This preview shows page 1 out of 1 page.

PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1, ( 11 Jupiter)2021-2022,QUARTER 3, WEEK 5, PERFORMANCE TASK NO. 31If this paper is lost, please send to: Rowena P. De Roselin / Subject Teacher /Practical Research 1Name___________________________________ Section:_________________ Score:________Activity 2. Dirt free BoxDirections: Fill in the box below, with your insights or views of today’s lesson. Youmaywrite words or statements in the box. The title is dirt free box because it isrelated to your actions as a researcher that you followed ethical standards indeveloping your research.Shyla Mae B. Picazo11-JupiterMy insights or views of todays lesson is that researchers must follow a set of ethicalstandards or guidelines in writing a literature review. Following the guidelines ensurescredibility, academic honesty and integrity among researchers.Academic integrity is a commitment, even in the face of adversity, to five fundamentalvalues: honesty, trust, fairness, respect, and responsibility. In other words, you musttake full responsibility for your work, acknowledge your own efforts, and acknowledgethe contributions of others’ efforts. Working/Writing with integrity requires accuratelyrepresenting what you contributed, as well as acknowledging how others have
End of preview. Want to read the entire page?

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

Term
Summer
Professor
N/A
Tags
Academia, Academic dishonesty, researcher

Newly Uploaded Documents

Show More

Newly Uploaded Documents

Show More

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture