Response paper 43-56

Response paper 43-56 - AH 105 Response Paper Playful Ambiguity and Political Authority at the Large Relief at Mamallapuram Throughout the

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 2/25/08 AH 105 Response Paper: Playful Ambiguity and Political Authority at the Large Relief at Mamallapuram Throughout the interpretation of ancient Indian art, art historians have deciphered many universal symbols and narratives; however, there are always countless ways to read a piece of art. I do not wish to make any over-arching statements about the entirety of Indian art history, but I believe that the approach that Padma Kaimal and a few of her colleagues have taken on the large piece at Mamallapuram is the wisest of the relief’s interpretations. The city in possession of the frieze, Mamallapuram, was a “primary trade and port city of the southern Indian Pallava dynasty” in the seventh century. (43) Mamallapuram is home to countless granite monuments, but the most famous of these is a narrative relief overlooking the Indian bay. While our class has seen only singular narratives portrayed in a similar style, this relief contains “elements from at least two major stories found in the...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/19/2008 for the course AH 105 taught by Professor Linrothe during the Spring '08 term at Trinity College, Hartford.

Page1 / 2

Response paper 43-56 - AH 105 Response Paper Playful Ambiguity and Political Authority at the Large Relief at Mamallapuram Throughout the

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online