301-note-pp16-35

301-note-pp16-35 - CHAPTER 5: CHOICE The optimization...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
CHAPTER 5: CHOICE The optimization principle: A rational consumer chooses a consumption bundle that is preferred the most in the budget constraint. The optimal choice is a consumption bundle, also called a demand bundle ,inth e budget constraint that is weakly preferred to any other bundle in the budget constraint. In other words, there is no consumption bundle in the budget constraint that is strictly prefered to a demand bundle. In our notation, consumption bundle ( x 1 ,x 2 ) is a demand bundle if p 1 x 1 + p 2 x 2 m ,and for any consumption bundle ( x 1 ,x 2 ) such that p 1 x 1 + p 2 x 2 m , ( x 1 ,x 2 ) º ( x 1 ,x 2 ) ⇐⇒ u ( x 1 ,x 2 ) u ( x 1 ,x 2 ) . This means that u ( x 1 ,x 2 ) is the maximum of the utility function over the budget constraint. That is, u ( x 1 ,x 2 )=m a x x 1 ,x 2 u ( x 1 ,x 2 ) , subject to p 1 x 1 + p 2 x 2 m. This constrained optimization problem is referred as the consumer problem . Under certain conditions, the budget line is tangent to an indi f erence curve at a demand bundle: - 6 x 1 x 2 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z s x 2 x 1 An interior solution to the consumer problem. The budget line and such an di f erence curve have the same slope at an interior demand bundle. A necessary condition is slope of indi f erence curve = MRS = p 1 p 2 = slope of budget line.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
On the graph, it is easy to argue that if these two rates of substitution are di f erent, then the consumption bundle cannot be a demand bundle. Suppose that MRS is 1but p 1 p 2 = 2. The consumer is willing to exchange one unit of good 1 with one unit of good 2. Good 1 costs twice as much as good 2. Consider the following procedure which will make the consumer better o f :t h ec o n - sumer buys one unit less of good 1, with the money saved, the consumer will be able to buy two more units of good 2. Note that just one more unit of good 2 will make the consumer indi f erent for giving up one unit of good 1. The additional one unit of good 2 will make the consumer better o f . So the consumption bundle where MRS 6 = p 1 p 2 cannot be an optimal choice. A few exceptions to this necessary condition. 1. MRS does not exist, such as perfect complements; 2. Non-interior solution, corner solution, such as perfect substitutes; - 6 x 1 x 2 0 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ C C C C C C C C X X X X X X X X s Kinky tastes. - 6 x 1 x 2 0 H H H H H H H H s Corner solution. 3. Non-convex preference, - 6 x 1 x 2 0 @ @ @ @ @ @ c s
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/19/2008 for the course ECON 305 taught by Professor Souza during the Spring '08 term at Vanderbilt.

Page1 / 20

301-note-pp16-35 - CHAPTER 5: CHOICE The optimization...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online