Taking Sides - Taking Sides Issue 4: Is Multiple...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Taking Sides Issue 4: Is Multiple Personality Disorder a Valid Diagnosis? YES: meets the standards for the three basic forms of validity (content validity, construct validity, and criterion-related validity). NO: it is a socially created behavioral disorder induced by psychotherapists. A person develops seemingly independent personalities each with unique characteristics and behaviors. Official diagnostic term changed in last 10 years to “dissociative identity disorder.” At least 2 personalities recurrently take control of person and they can’t recall important personal info. Few cases were reported in 20 th century until 1980’s when DSM-III included it. In recent decades many 1000’s have been reported. Some think the disorder could be iatrogenic – created in a patient by a psychotherapist (often through hypnosis). YES 3 main criticisms: 1) iatrogenic disorder produced by psychiatrists in their patients 2) produced by media portrayal 3) number of cases is increasing exponentially. Response to 1 and 2: why MPD? If patients are so suggestible why don’t they develop another disorder? Response to 3: other diseases show equal or faster rise in # of cases including Lyme disease, OCD, and chronic fatigue syndrome. Reflects a basic process in medicine Model of diagnostic validity of Robins and Guze: psychiatric diagnosis must satisfy three levels of validity. 1) content validity (ability to give a specific and detailed description of disorder) 2) criterion-related validity (laboratory tests must be consistent with the defined clinical picture) 3)construct/discriminant validity (must be delimited from other disorders). MPD has been shown to fulfill criteria. Condition is presently conceptualized with posttraumatic dissociative disorder. NO Many diseases have had a history of hysteria and suggestibility. Patients are reinforced with attention from physicians to display symptoms of a disorder. Example: Charcot and Babinski studied “hysteroepilepsy” in 1918. Patients showed increased symptoms with persuasion (focus on the disease) and decreased symptoms with counterpersuasion (focusing on other aspects of life). Issue 13:
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/20/2008 for the course PSYCH 380 taught by Professor Halgin during the Spring '08 term at UMass (Amherst).

Page1 / 4

Taking Sides - Taking Sides Issue 4: Is Multiple...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online