Ahr2 - Bethany Fort ARH 303 February 7 2007 Response Paper#2 In"Artemisia and Susanna Mary D Garrard evaluates Artemisia Gentileschi's Susanna and

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Bethany Fort ARH 303 February 7, 2007 Response Paper #2 In “Artemisia and Susanna,” Mary D. Garrard evaluates Artemisia Gentileschi’s Susanna and the Elders by analyzing common conventions of other Susanna paintings and details from Artemisia’s life. According to Garrard, other painters sexualized, eroticized, and portrayed Susanna as vulnerable. Most scenes depicted by other painters glorify the rape of Susanna as a “celebration of sexual opportunity,” (150). Even exceptions such as Adriaan van der Burg that show the intense emotion of Susanna do not ask us to identify with her by idealizing her figure. Many times this is done by paralleling her to Venus, who is associated with sexuality. In contrast, Artemisia’s Susanna and the Elders depicts a dismayed woman turning away from the Elders. Although she is naked and vulnerable, she is not sexualized. Artemisia does this by borrowing her pose from Orestes’ nurse. Garrard supports an idea of the true story being one in which Susanna “is heroic in the classical
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/20/2008 for the course ART 305 taught by Professor Unknown during the Fall '08 term at University of Texas at Austin.

Page1 / 2

Ahr2 - Bethany Fort ARH 303 February 7 2007 Response Paper#2 In"Artemisia and Susanna Mary D Garrard evaluates Artemisia Gentileschi's Susanna and

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online