Unformatted text preview: first says that there will always be more basic structures discovered, but the second statement states that there is a beginning point to start everything. It’s almost like comparing it to the argument made about cutting cells in half. If one were to cut a cell in half continuously, would there ever be a point that it is impossible to cut in half again? Is there an end to how far back something can be traced, or does it continue back infinitely? He contradicts himself and just doesn’t seem to take a definite stance on the topics....
View Full Document
- Spring '08
- Philosophy, Debut albums, Zach