Human Benefits and Animal Rights

Human Benefits and Animal Rights - “The question is not,...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: “The question is not, Can they reason ? Can they talk ? but, Can t-Jeremy Bentham Ian Ratliff ISAT 131 06:40:42 Human Benefits and Animal Rights Many cats and dogs are euthanized each week in animal shelters. Animal shelters simply cannot adopt out enough cats and dogs that reproduce in the corners of back allies. Because the animal is going to be void from the planet anyway, is it unethical to use a perfectly healthy animal for medical students to perform surgery on? 1 Jeremy Bentham, the founding father of modern utilitarianism, takes a viewpoint that takes up for the animals. He compares a full grown dog and horse to a newborn infant, stating that the animal has more reasoning abilities than the newborn. Infants are regarded highly when it comes to ethical values because it is innocent human life that has a world of potential ahead of it. It would not be popular for a human to accept the testing of an infant for the benefits of other humans. Due to this, it is not the reasoning ability that justifies whether it is wrong, but the fact humans....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/20/2008 for the course ISAT 131 taught by Professor Tang during the Spring '08 term at James Madison University.

Page1 / 2

Human Benefits and Animal Rights - “The question is not,...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online