term paper - UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY An Era of Naval...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY An Era of Naval Disarmament: The 1922 Five Power Treaty NS300: NAVAL WARFARE SECTION 1120 LT SEMPLE BY MIDSHIPMAN MICHAEL J. SLAGH ’08, CO 16 ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND 16 NOVEMBER 2006
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
An Era of Naval Disarmament: The 1922 Five Power Treaty The Five Power Treaty of 1922 ended the race of naval armament when it was signed on 6 February 1922. The fundamentals of the treaty were an agreement to get rid of a large number of battleships and cruisers as well as to create a ten-year period in which the signatory powers would build no new capital ships. President Warren G. Harding sent a formal invitation on 11 August 1921 to Great Britain, Italy, Japan, and France which had objectives for an international naval conference. The two main objectives were distinct, including limiting armament and answering Pacific and Far Eastern questions, namely an increasingly militant Japan. i There were also economic concerns, as delegates had to please the legislators who were unwilling to spend more on shipbuilding. The ideology adhered to the American policy of negotiating at conferences, which would have worldwide repercussions. President Harding had faith in the long lasting effects of the treaty. “This conference has wrought a truly great achievement…[it] will mark the beginning of a new and better epoch in human progress.” ii His faith was warranted at the time, but due to the all-encompassing nature of the treaty there were a few unpredictable consequences. In actuality, the treaty not only affected the naval doctrine of U.S. forces over the next few decades, but also strategy in World War II. In 1917, disposing of Germany’s Pacific empire was a major source of friction between the countries involved in World War I. As the countries contemplated a German loss, covert agreements were made that only amplified the pressure. “Britain secretly agreed in 1917 to support Japan’s claims to German islands…in return for Japanese support of the British empire’s acquisition of Germany’s much smaller south Pacific holdings.” iii The agreement was not a secret as time passed, but it was not intensely publicized. Nevertheless, it increased international Slagh 2
Background image of page 2
tensions and there was no certain solution. It was clear, however, that the roles of international navies would increase with the expansion to islands in the Far East and elsewhere. After World War I, the U.S. sought a new postwar balance of power in the Middle East. America helped to turn the tide in the first World War, and as a result U.S. international influence changed completely. “Whereas the end of the war saw decreased American interest and influence in Europe, after the Armistice the United States found itself the leading Western power in the Far East.” iv With power came responsibility and a new era in American international affairs. Something had to be done as tensions grew and the United States was looked upon as an international presence. The growing worldwide influence of the U.S. mandated that Far Eastern questions be
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/21/2008 for the course NS 300 taught by Professor Smith during the Fall '06 term at Naval Academy.

Page1 / 14

term paper - UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY An Era of Naval...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online