Tying - www.swapnotes.com Tying Overview Tying may be...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Tying Overview Tying may be challenged under §1 or §2 of the Sherman Act or §3 of the Clayton Act o Note b §3 of the Clayton Act does not apply to services (like advertising)…therefore tying in service markets must be evaluated under the Sherman Act (see Times Picayune ) “Tying ” – the sale or lease of one product (the “tying” product) on the condition that the buyer or lessee take a second product (the “tied” product) as well Per Se Rule in Name Only Early view b tying serves “hardly any purpose other than to suppress competition” – Northern Pacific RR (1958) o Theory (wrong) b a monopoly in one market would lead to a monopoly in another mkt s Why it is wrong b a monopolist would have already maximized profits in the tying market…and 2 monopolies are not necessarily better than one o Northern Pacific RR adopted a per se rule w/ respect to tie-ins Current view b a tying arrangement is still per se illegal Jefferson Parrish o Majority (J. Stevens)
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/14/2008 for the course LAW 7557 taught by Professor Crane during the Fall '07 term at Yeshiva.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online