Lecture Notes - 080206 - Katie Kerr PHL 304 August 2, 2006...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Katie Kerr PHL 304 August 2, 2006 Mary Anne Warren On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion 1. Critique of Standard Conservative Argument P1 It is wrong to kill an innocent human being P2 A fetus is an innocent human being. C Thus, it is wrong to kill a fetus. MAW: This argument either commits fallacy of ambiguity (i) or is question- begging (ii) (i) Conclusion does not follow. Innocent human being: (a) genetic sense (homo sapiens) (b) moral sense (person) Argument assumes (a) in P2 and (b) in P1. OR (ii) If same sense in both P1 and P2: Argument begs the question. It presupposes precisely what is at stake. If (a): whether fetus is a person (P2) If (b): whether its wrong to kill a homo sapiens (P1) P1 is a self-evident truth only if by human being we person in the moral sense (a) P2 is not question begging if intended in the genetic sense (b)....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/21/2008 for the course PHIL 304 taught by Professor Roddy during the Summer '07 term at University of Texas at Austin.

Page1 / 2

Lecture Notes - 080206 - Katie Kerr PHL 304 August 2, 2006...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online