Lecture Notes - 070506

Lecture Notes - 070506 - Katie Kerr PHL 304 July 5 2006...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Katie Kerr PHL 304 July 5, 2006 Deterrence and Death Penalty Louis Pojman No conclusive statistical evidence supporting deterrent effect of death penalty. 1) Best Bet Argument- uncertainty is presupposed Death Penalty: Use It Don’t Use It Deters Less murders, innocent lives saved Murders aren’t prevented (potential victims are killed who might have been saved) Doesn’t Deter Lose one murderer’s life Saved the life of one criminal Problems: - Could have negative effect (only considers positive/neutral effect)- What if you only prevented 2 murders, but killed 4 murderers? How would you weight that for benefit? 2) Commonsense Evidence “Not enough to shower death penalty deters, must show it deters more than life imprisonment” - Pojman’s argument from anecdotal evidence: o What people fear most has greatest deterrent effect o People fear death penalty more than any other punishment...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/21/2008 for the course PHIL 304 taught by Professor Roddy during the Summer '07 term at University of Texas.

Page1 / 2

Lecture Notes - 070506 - Katie Kerr PHL 304 July 5 2006...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online