Part 1)1.a.The prompt is asking us to synthesize information from at least threeof the given sources and incorporate it into an essay that identifies thekey issues associated with the locavore movement and examines theirimplications for the community.b.I addressed all parts of the prompt but, even though I used at least 3sources, I didn’t show how they all relate to each other. Even thoughit’s not in the prompt, I didn’t answer the “so what?” question.c.I didn’t really stray off-topic; I talked about the various consequencesof the locavore movement on the effects it could have on thecommunity which is what the prompt asked ford.I would say it’s probably a strength because it makes it more clearwhat type of essay I’m going to write and also regarding exactly whatresolution or stance I’m supposed to take.e.Honestly, the biggest improvement I can make with prompt dissectionis increasing the speed at which I do it. I’m not that fast of a writer soI don't think it would be wise to try and spend a lot of time on theprompt dissection2.CriteriaYour EvaluationEvidence fromYour EssayUse What YouHave Learned InOrder to GrowThesisI am biased, but Iwould honestly arguethat my thesis showssome complexthinking. I chose mytwo key issues withthe locavoremovement and I alsoincluded that the“middleman”, thecorporations, wouldbe affected“However, if themiddleman, thecorporations, werecut out andconsumers startedpurchasing localfood, a positive effecton the local economyand quality of foodcould be noted.”“However, if themiddleman, albeit,the sometimes quiteuseful middleman,were to be cut out andconsumers startedpurchasing localfood, a positive effecton the local economyand quality of food,increasing overallhuman health, couldbe noted.”Organization