Leslie Sp06 Trusts & Estates - Outline

Leslie Sp06 Trusts & Estates - Outline - Trusts...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Trusts & Estates - Outline www.swapnotes.com Page 1 of 47 Professor Melanie Leslie Spring 2006 Chapter 1-Introduction A. Inheritances-Pros and Cons: a. Cons: i. Inequality-not fair for some pp to start off w tons of $ just b/c are heirs ii. Enforcement-not possible to enforce it fairly iii. Policy: conditioned inheritances are pp imposing desire after dead iv. Decreased Productivity-pp will lose incentive to be productive 1. Argument against this: Life Cycle Hypothesis-predominant motivation for working is to provide for self , not to leave legacy 2. Answer: Inheritances decreases productivity of next generation. v. Inequitable-old pp give assets before die and dont have $ they need b. Pros: (justifications for having inheritances) i. Pp have a natural right to bequeath and accords w/ their wishes ii. Utilitarian-create incentive to industry & save b/c pp want to bequeath iii. Pp contribute to earning the wealth iv. Social Life-kids care for person b/c know will get $ from him v. Hard to Curtail-pp will find other less efficient means to transfer $ vi. Property-property has value to extent that can give it away after you die vii. Create greater dependency on gov b/c increase # pp need gov support B. Tension: Testamentary Freedom vs.Public Policy a. Ford v Ford-17- stabbed mom 40 times, but inherited b/c criminally insane i. Slayer Rule-if kill s/o, cant get their $ b/c cant profit from own crime. 1. She still inherited b/c didnt understand doing wrong so doesnt go against the purpose of the slayer rule. 2. Objectives of Slayer Rule : a. Deter pp from killing pp to get $. i. Doesnt make sense b/c so who isnt scared of death penalty wont be deterred b/c not getting $. b. Morality-killer doesnt deserve to get $ c. Furthers testamentary freedom b/c decedent would never want killer to get their $. ii. UPC 2-803-(25)-cant inherit if feloniously and intentionally killed s/o 1. UPC doesnt help court b/c same inquiry to determine if fel/int C. Probate and Non-Probate Transfers a. Probate i. Why is Probate Necessary? 1. Decides Conflicts When Will Contests-need standing to contest a. Standing : intestate heir or beneficiary under prior will 2. Notice to all Known Heirs-if no probate and kid comes, issues! 3. Starts the SOL of Creditors Claims : clean way to make sure e/o paid, but it takes time to go through the whole legal process. 4. Enables Transfer of Assets to PR a. To prove ownership/title, need probate to get a letter of administration (no will) or of testamentary (will) ii. Probate v Non-Probate Assets Trusts & Estates - Outline www.swapnotes.com Page 2 of 47 Professor Melanie Leslie Spring 2006 1. Will determines distribution of probate assets. Distribution of Non-Probate Assets determined by other instrument, such as K....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/14/2008 for the course LAW 7441 taught by Professor Cunningham during the Spring '06 term at Yeshiva.

Page1 / 47

Leslie Sp06 Trusts & Estates - Outline - Trusts...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online