Goodrich F00-Jurisprudence BIGNOTE

Goodrich F00-Jurisprudence BIGNOTE - www.swapnotes.com Elan...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1 Elan Weinreb August 29, 2000 Jurisprudence Jurisprudence is a philosophy course. It has no prerequisites. However, you have to have to like that way of thinking. It will be hard to figure out what we’re doing. This is a different type of course. There’s no doctrine to learn; no orthodox answers to questions. There’s very little reading in this class. Explication of the material is key. What is this course about? A: About law – philosophy of law. This course is about analytical jurisprudence, as opposed to normative jurisprudence. It is what is the nature of law, what makes the law law – basic understanding of courts, law, rules, responsibility, rights – this is analytical jurisprudence. Normative jurisprudence is about normative inquiries – not what is the law but how should the law be or what ought the law should be. What is law? Law is what you learn in law school. But what makes law school law school? Virtually everyone’s understanding of what law is is incorrect. We will attempt to explain what law is. The right analysis, however, is hard to come by. How is law different from religion, morality, etiquette, Canadian law, etc.? This is a complicated question. MAIN QUESTION: Law shouldn’t exist, law can’t possibly exist, for the existence of law is a paradox. Why? Who makes legal rules? Those with legal authority. Legal authority, however, is a product of legal rules. And who created those rules that created legal authority? This is a classic chicken-egg problem (“How could eggs or chickens ever exist in the first place?”). The primary efficient cause is unknown…. . Legal authority is created by legal rules. Legal rules are created by legal authority. Both are circular. Neither has a separate existence. Evolution solved the chicken-egg problem (i.e., common ancestors of chickens were the cause of chickens’ existence). Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce under enumerated powers (Article I, Section 8). The authority of Congress derives from the Constitution. But what makes the Constitution authoritative? Article VII (9 of 12 states must ratify). How, though, can Article VII give power to the states to ratify the Constitution when it is part and parcel of the Constitution? In order for Article VII to be valid, it has to be invested with authority from some entity OTHER THAN ARTICLE VII. The Constitution has to be a valid document first for it to be applicable. www.swapnotes.com
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
2 So, where does the authority of the Constitution come from? We are left with a paradox. One answer to this paradox: God – Divine right of kings. God invests authority into legal officials to legislate. God’s the first chicken. But let’s take God out of the picture. Who made the agency that made the Constitution, that made law? Note that there is a difference between power and authority. Authority is a claim of
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/14/2008 for the course LAW 7211 taught by Professor Goodrich during the Fall '00 term at Yeshiva.

Page1 / 104

Goodrich F00-Jurisprudence BIGNOTE - www.swapnotes.com Elan...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online