Test 2 Review - Philosophy 304: Contemporary Moral Problems...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Philosophy 304: Contemporary Moral Problems TEST 2 REV IEW 05:07:15 Format: essay test. Sample Questions Below Essays: 1. Describe thoroughly the majority opinion in Goodridge v. Department of Health, including its rationale and its conclusions. Provide a brief description of the dissenting opinion of Sosman. a. Civil marriage important, gives certain benefits b. No fundamental right in question, rational basis is best means of evaluating Could an impartial lawmaker logically believe that the classification would serve a legitimate public purpose that transcends the harm to the members of the disadvantaged class? c. Department has three reasons for denying homosexual marriage i. Providing a favorable setting for procreation Marriage is not intrinsically linked to procreation; it is the committing to one another ii. Ensuring the optimal setting for child rearing (which the department defines as a two-parent family with one parent of each sex 1. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest this...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/22/2008 for the course PHL 304 taught by Professor Leon during the Fall '08 term at University of Texas at Austin.

Page1 / 3

Test 2 Review - Philosophy 304: Contemporary Moral Problems...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online