phil paper 2

phil paper 2 - National Review, Feb 12, 2007 v59 i2 p31...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
National Review , Feb 12, 2007 v59 i2 p31 Families and first principles: the conservative fight to protect life and defend marriage. George, Robert P. . USC Content Connection USC Content Connection Full Text: COPYRIGHT 2007 National Review, Inc. THE MEANING OF MATRIMONY Let me now turn to marriage. The institution is battered, but it is not lost. Private pro- marriage forces, such as Marriage Savers, are doing important work through churches and other institutions. Much damage to the critically important marriage culture was done by bad legislation and policy, almost always in the name of reform. That legislation and policy is now itself in need of reform. The conservative movement should remember what marriage is and why it is in the public interest for law and policy to take cognizance of it and support it. Marriage is a pre-political form of association--what might be called a natural institution. It is not created by law, though law recognizes and regulates it in every culture. Nowhere is it treated as a purely private matter, the way we (rightly) treat baptisms and bar mitzvahs. Some on the libertarian wing of conservatism toy with the idea that marriage could in fact be privatized, and wonder whether that might be the solution to the controversy over same-sex "marriage." I understand why someone would consider this idea, but it strikes me as a very bad one. There is a reason that all cultures treat marriage as a matter of public concern and even recognize it in law and regulate it. The family is the fundamental unit of society. It is the original and best department of health, education, and welfare. Governments rely on families to produce something that they could not possibly produce--namely, upright, decent people who make honest, law-abiding, public-spirited citizens. And marriage is the indispensable foundation of the family. Although all marriages in all cultures have their imperfections, children flourish in an environment where they benefit from the love and care of both parents, and from the committed and exclusive love of their parents for each other. Conservatives of all stripes--and, indeed, anyone who believes in limited government-- should, far from favoring the privatization of marriage, strongly back government support for it. In the absence of a strong marriage culture, families fail to form; when they do form they are often unstable; absentee fathers become a serious problem; out-of-wedlock births are common; and a train of social pathologies follows. With families failing to perform their health, education, and welfare functions, the demand for government to step in grows, whether in the form of greater policing, as an arbiter of conflicts between unmarried parents, or as a provider of other social services. Bureaucracies must be
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
created, and they inexorably grow. Everyone suffers--with the poorest and most vulnerable (and therefore most reliant on a healthy marriage culture) suffering most. Someone has to pay for policing and massively increased social services, and that
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 10

phil paper 2 - National Review, Feb 12, 2007 v59 i2 p31...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online