correct_based_on_the_given_comments_0 - NORTHCENTRAL...

This preview shows page 1 - 3 out of 22 pages.

NORTHCENTRAL UNIVERSITY ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET Chad, Hello. Each score for each question receives a grade based upon the scoring system shown below. Added together they yield the total score for the question (80% and above is passing for each question). You had 1 question -question 3. Your score is 74. See my grading summary for question 3 below in the grading tables below and review my many detailed comments inside your exam. One major concern was that variables in your design (number of variables and which one is the dependent variable) change at different points. Understanding of some key aspects of research design as it relates to your study, are not accurate. There were other concerns that are also discussed in my detailed feedback below, inside the exam. With some help from a research design specialist and a little more research concerning a specific related theory, I believe you can pass this question. Please let me know of any questions. Sincerely, Dr. Karl Lloyd 412-773-0527
LEHMANCCMP9500 Question 3 Grading Table Comprehensive Examination Grading Rubric (for each individual paper) Grading Area Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement Score Focus & Topic Development (7.5 points) 7.5 points The Student’s response includes a thorough discussion of the topic. The Student displays a deep understanding of the theory and content for the topic. Responses remain focused on the basic theme or topic. 6 points The Student’s response addresses the topic and includes theoretical and conceptual content. Additional detail is needed to sufficiently address the topic. Some tangential information may be included. 0-5 points The response lacks focus and detail in terms of theoretical and conceptual principles that are essential to this topic. Responses may be largely tangential and lack focus on the assigned topic. 4.0 Analysis & Critical Thinking (5 points) 5 points The response exhibits analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of the literature covered. The Student establishes and supports a position on the topic and presents her/his own point of view in the response. 4 points The response includes some analytic, integrative, and evaluative writing but would be strengthened by more extensive critical thinking and support for the Student’s position on the topic. 0-3 points The response shows insufficient evidence of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of content that is presented in support of the Student’s position for this topic. 4.0 Organization, Coherence, Logic, & Flow (2.5 points) 2.5 points The response is clear. It articulates a cohesive discussion of theory and related practice. 2 points The response is clearly structured, for the most part, and presented following a logical progression of ideas but some sections are unclear or 0-1 points The response lacks clarity and is difficult to follow.

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture