phil.1022

phil.1022 - Philosophy 20A Hannen 10/22/07 The Eleatics...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Philosophy 20A Hannen 10/22/07 The Eleatics Parmenides There is only one thing Impossibility of becoming Obvious that there is plurality “How could what-is be in the future; and how could it come-to-be? For if it came to be, it is not, nor is it if at sometime it is going to be.” Change is an illusion, an impossibility What exists is a unity “nor is it divisible…it is all continuous for what-is is in contact with what-is” Get around Heraclitus’ arguments, is to say nothing can change, there is only one thing, nothing is stable Only notice things until don’t have them (health, air ,rest, etc) Argument of the Impossibility of Space: P1: What exists is indivisible. P2: Space is divisible. C: Therefore space does not exist Concept of space Zeno Arguments go beyond Parmenides Believes only one thing exists Insist that plurality is ridiculous “Nothing moves because what is traveling must first reach half-way point before
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/23/2008 for the course PHIL 20a taught by Professor Hannen during the Fall '07 term at UCSB.

Page1 / 2

phil.1022 - Philosophy 20A Hannen 10/22/07 The Eleatics...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online