RUBRIC - EDUC107.docx - Assessment Tool ( Analytical...

Assessment Tool
( Analytical Rubric)
We have created one of the most conventional and useful assessment tools in the field
of education. A grading rubric is a grid-like structure that incorporates criteria, levels of
performance, scores, and adjectives that serve as unique assessment tools for any
individual assignment, essay, or composition and performance tasks . The majority of
the learning abilities in this quarter are all about Literature, which is used to practice the
student's communicative competence. As a result, the teacher will be able to use the
student's grammatical awareness skills in speeches. compositions, essays, and other
relevant papers as well as performance task .Rubrics can be used to grade written
work, projects, oral presentations, performance tasks and any other class assignment in
both formative (ongoing) and summative (final) ways. Checklists, holistic rubrics,
analytic rubrics, and developmental rubrics are the four categories of rubrics. Analytical
Rubric is the type of rubric that is adapted to this content standard and performance
standard. It evaluates all aspects of a student's output . Each segment is given a certain
number of points, which add up to the student's total score. Projects and Performance
Tasks with analytic rubrics take longer to grade, but they are useful formative and
summative evaluation tools for teachers. It gives students a much clearer clarification of
the evaluation criteria and by this students benefit from receiving rubrics because they
learn about their relative strengths and weaknesses. Each criterion has corresponding
assigned points. And lastly , the advantages of Analytical rubric are criterion can be
weighted and scored and they take less time to create than a holistic rubric.
Performance
Indicators
Outstanding
( 50 pts)
Good
( 45 pts)
Competent
( 40 pts)
Needs
improvement
(35 pts)
Thesis and • Efficiently • Has a clear • Has a central • Lacks a

organization organizes
paper around a
clear,
compelling
argument
• Develops
argument
thoughtfully
and
persuasively
• Uses relevant,
convincing
evidence and
quotations that
thoroughly
support
argument
argument
• Effectively
organized and
developed
coherently
around central
argument
• Uses relevant
evidence and
quotations that
support central
argument
idea
• Mostly
organized
around a
central idea,
but may lose
focus at times
• Uses relevant
evidence and
quotations to
support central
idea
central idea
• Unfocused
organization
• Little,
irrelevant, or no
evidence used
Analysis • Provides deep
insight and
creates
meaningful
interpretation of
texts
• Elaborates on
central
argument and
meaning of
supporting
evidence;
• Creates
meaningful
interpretation of
texts
• Explores
central
argument and
meaning of
supporting
evidence;
• Analysis
drives
• Provides
basic
interpretation of
texts
• Develops
central idea
and explains
choice of
evidence and
quotations
• Summarizes
or uses faulty
analysis
• Little or no
interpretation of