This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: can an average person could tell this was is this advancing (endorsing) one particular religion? So is trying to establish that ID is creationism and therefore religious. Shows that ID evolved after creationism was shot down. Section E.2 and E.3 How will an objective observer interpret this disclaimer? It singles out Darwins theory and discriminated against it. Opting out policy, if they dont teach it makes ID intriguing and mysterious. Are we learning it just to pass the test? Decision an objective student would find this disclaimer to be an endorsement of ID (which is just simply creationism repackaged) School board sent out a letter to the entire community about the policy (even those without students). Looking at what the newspaper, letters to the editor from Dover. So, even the Objective Dover Citizen will agree this is endorsement....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 04/26/2008 for the course RELI 127 taught by Professor Weiner during the Spring '08 term at UNC.
- Spring '08
- The Bible