{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

PhilLecture01 - Essay Part I Crito's argument must be valid...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Essay- Part I. Crito’s argument must be valid; if the premises are all true the conclusion must be true. An argument is valid when there’s no way for all of the premises to be true while the conclusion is false. A valid argument can still be bad for the premises can be wrong. Part II- Socrates points out flaws in Crito’s argument but you do not need to say if he agrees with his conclusion. One can agree with all premises and conclusion, but still be invalid. Part III- Same as Part I for Socrates. DO NOT: (1) Email it to the wrong TA (2) Fail to email an electronic copy to your TA (3) Fail to attach the paper to your email
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}