This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
1) The relevant formula we need comes back in Chapter 28.1, where Knight tells us how current
is related to the motion of electrons, i = n A v(drift).
Note that i here is NOT the current (!!), it's the "electron current", the # of electrons passing by
each second. The last problem of last week's CAPA (or Knight 28.11) tells us that the regular
current I = i*e, it's the number of electrons passing each second times the charge per electron.
(And, I is in the opposite direction of i, but here we're dealing in magnitudes)
Putting this all together, I get v(drift) = (I/A) / (n e)
(Oh, hey, this also comes straight from Knight 28.12, which we just partly rederived!)
I is given, it's the current in Amps.
A is the cross sectional area, pi r^2. (Watch units, put r into meters BEFORE squaring!)
e is the charge of any charge carrier, but in this case, an electron, so e=1.6E19 C. (I use a plus
sign because we're looking for the drift SPEED, which must be positive)
The only tricky one is "n" which is # of carrier/volume. I get this by the following logic:
We are given rho (kg/m^3), and MW (molecular weight: I first converted to metric by dividing
the given number by 1000, so MW is in kg/mole rather than g/mole) We know Na, Avogadro's
number, 6.022E23, is the number of atoms/mole (do you know what this means? If not, it's worth
learning (or relearning) about Avogadros number, and moles**!) so we can combine these:
n = # atoms/m^3 = (# kg/m^3)*(#moles/kg)*(#atoms/mole)
= (kg/m^3) * (atoms/mol) / (kg/mol)
= rho * Na / MW.
These were all given in the problem (except Na, which is in the front flyleaf of your text), and
remember that you need to plug in MW in kg/mol, not g/mol, to keep the units consistent.
Now we know all the quantities in the equation at the top, just plug in.
**Here's a related joke: Do you know what Avocado's number is? It's a guacamole.
... (Ouch!)
2) This one is pretty straightforward  use R = rho*L/A, where rho = resistivity (not density!),
and L=length, and A = cross sectional area. (Once again, use pi R^2, notice that they gave us
diameter, so R = D/2) Again, be sure to convert all quantities to MKS, before squaring or
anything. That's it. The numbers are all fairly realistic, the result (which was on the order of a
fraction of an Ohm) seems quite reasonable for reallife wires in your house. The more
interesting part is what we do with this in the next question:
3) CAPA asks for power. Now, there are 3 formulas, P=VI, V^2/R, or I^2R. In this case, they
told us I, and we just found R, so the easiest to use is I^2R. That's it. You're done with the
CAPA question, but let's *think* about this results for a second. With the numbers I was given
(which I claim are all perfectly reasonable household numbers) this came out to be 60W, as
much as a light bulb. Think about how hot a bulb feels! This is getting close to a fire risk
(although, granted, it's spread out over 30 meters, almost 100 feet), and is the reason why you
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up
to
access the rest of the document.
 Fall '08
 ROGERS
 Current

Click to edit the document details