PAM200_Section11_Notes

# PAM200_Section11_Notes - PAM200 Section 11 Problem 14.1 The...

This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

Problem 14.1. The Nash Equilibrium is: Player 1 chooses Up while Player 2 chooses Left. Problem 14.2. There are two Nash equilibria. Nash equilibrium #1: Player 1 chooses SOUTH, Player 2 chooses WEST. Nash equilibrium #2: Player 1 chooses NORTH, Player 2 chooses EAST Problem 14.3. Player 1 has a dominant strategy (UP), which means that DOWN is dominated. Player 2 does not have a dominant strategy, but it does have a dominated strategy (MIDDLE). The Nash equilibrium in this game is for Player 1 to choose UP and Player 2 to choose LEFT Problem 14.4. In this game, “Aggressive” is a dominant strategy for both firms. Thus, the Nash equilibrium strategy for both firms is to choose “Aggressive.” This game is an example of the prisoners’ dilemma. In this game both players have a dominant strategy that leads to an outcome that does not maximize the collective payoffs of the players in the game. If both players chose the “Restrained” strategy, then both players would increase their profits and the collective payoff would be maximized. Problem 14.10.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

## This homework help was uploaded on 02/19/2009 for the course PAM 2000 taught by Professor Evans,t. during the Fall '07 term at Cornell.

### Page1 / 2

PAM200_Section11_Notes - PAM200 Section 11 Problem 14.1 The...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online