Code-Chap7_ResearchPaper

Code-Chap7_ResearchPaper - SEVEN what things regulate JOHN...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
SEVEN what things regulate JOHN STUART MILL WAS AN ENGLISHMAN, THOUGH ONE OF THE MOST INFLUENTIAL political philosophers in America in the nineteenth century. His writings ranged from important work on logic to a still striking text, The Subjection of Women. But his continuing influence comes from a relatively short book titled On Liberty. Pub- lished in 1859, this powerful argument for individual liberty and diversity of thought represents an important view of liberal and libertarian thinking in the sec- ond half of the nineteenth century "Libertarian:' however, has a specific meaning for us. It associates with argu- ments against government.' Government, in the modern libertarian's view, is the threat to liberty; private action is not. Thus, the good libertarian is focused on re- ducing government's power. Curb the excesses of government, the libertarian says, and you will have ensured freedom for your society. Mill's view was not so narrow. He was a defender of liberty and an opponent of forces that suppressed it. But those forces were not confined to government. Liberty, in Mill's view, was threatened as much by norms as by government, as much by stigma and intolerance as by the threat of state punishment. His objective was to argue against these private forces of coercion. His work was a defense against liberty-suppressing norms, because in England at the time these were the real threat to liberty. Mill's method is important, and it should be our own. It asks, What is the threat to liberty, and how can we resist it? It is not limited to asking, What is the threat to liberty from government? It understands that more than government can threaten liberty, and that sometimes this something more can be private rather than state ac- tion. Mill was not so concerned with the source. His concern was with liberty. Threats to liberty change. In England norms may have been the problem in the late nineteenth century; in the United States in the first two decades of the twentieth cen- tury it was state suppression of speech.2 The labor movement was founded on the idea that the market is sometimes a threat to liberty-not just because of low wages, but
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
also because the market form of organization itself disables a certain kind of freedom.) In other societies, at other times, the market is the key, not the enemy, to liberty. [T~US, rather than think of an enemy in the abstract, we should understand the partndar threat to liberty that exists in a particular time and plactzd this is es- pecially true when we think about liberty in cyberspace. For my argument is that cy- J berspace teaches a new threat to liberty. Not new in the sense that no theorist has conceived of it before. Others have.4 But new in the sense of newly urgent. We are coming to understand a newly powerful regulator in cyberspace, and we don't yet understand how best to control it.
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/20/2009 for the course INFO 5150 taught by Professor Mitrano during the Fall '08 term at Cornell.

Page1 / 21

Code-Chap7_ResearchPaper - SEVEN what things regulate JOHN...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online