This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: ii) Agrees with holding, forget the value judgment because it is broadcast media. f) TEST – Chiplinsky – tight social value balancing test value vs. societies right to order 4) Civil Liberties v Civil Rights a) Civil Rights – take action to protect b) Civil Liberties – actions that the government cannot restrict 5) Hate crimes – patterns, power, minority/majority 6) R.A.V. v St. Paul a) R.A.V. wins – expanding free speech rights - unanimous b) TEST – Chiplinsky test again c) Government can disallow categories but the not specific ideas within categories. i) Must disallow all fighting words not just intimidating fighting words d) Not overly broad but also not overly narrow 7) Wisconsin v Mitchell a) Wisconsin wins, unanimous – Sentence enhancements – are totally seen to be left up to the state government....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 02/19/2009 for the course LSJ 361 taught by Professor Squatrito during the Spring '09 term at University of Washington.
- Spring '09