1-21 notes - 01/21/2009 LSJ 361 Paper focus on the larger...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
01/21/2009 LSJ 361 Paper – focus on the larger argument – relationship between the judiciary and the legislature – especially the test in Frankfurter’s opinion – how to weigh the two different interests Case Brief Outline I – Title Citation and Date (think about the country during that period) Full Title Necessary ( Italicize the case ) II Facts – story behind the case (conciseness) How the lower courts ruled III Issues IV Holding – Reversed/Affirmed/Remanded V Procedure VI Rule VII Reasoning – Who wrote the reasoning and the vote count and the test Barron v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore , 32 U.S. (7 Pet.) 243 (1833) Facts: Barron believed that municipal street construction by the City had diverted the flow of streams which caused silt deposits in front of his warf. This made the water too shallow for boats to moor up which caused his business to cease. Issue(s): Whether the protections of 5th amendment takings clause of the U.S. Const. apply to the citizens against the actions of state government?
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/19/2009 for the course LSJ 361 taught by Professor Squatrito during the Spring '09 term at University of Washington.

Page1 / 2

1-21 notes - 01/21/2009 LSJ 361 Paper focus on the larger...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online