Con Law Amar Outline-2001

Con Law Amar Outline-2001 - C ONSTITUTIONAL L AW I The...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: C ONSTITUTIONAL L AW I. The Constitution of the United States ........................................................................................... 4 II. Judicial Review ........................................................................................................................... 5 III. The Equal Protection of the Laws .............................................................................................. 6 A. The Basic Structure of Equal Protection Review .................................................................... 6 1. Background and Early Decisions: Centrality of Race ......................................................... 6 Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857, p. 427) ....................................................................................... 6 From pp. 431-35 (Note 2 through end of 435) ......................................................................... 7 Ho Ah Kow v. Nunan (9th Cir. 1879, AR) .............................................................................. 7 2. “Standards of Review”: Mere Rationality and Heightened Scrutiny ....................................... 8 Railway Express v. NY (1949, p. 484) ................................................................................... 8 Williamson v. Lee Optical (1955, p. 485) ............................................................................... 8 Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co. (1981, p. 485) ........................................................ 8 Korematsu v. United States (1944, p. 501) .............................................................................. 9 Loving v. Virginia (1967, p. 533) ............................................................................................ 9 Washington v. Davis (1976, p. 514) ...................................................................................... 10 From pp. 519-21 (Notes 1-2) ................................................................................................. 10 Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. (1977, p. 523) . 11 Massachusetts Board of Retirement, et al. v. Murgia (1976, AR p. 6) .................................. 11 City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center (1985, p. 488 & 679) ....................................... 11 B. “Separate But Equal” – Brown v. Board of Education ....................................................... 12 Plessy v. Ferguson (1896, p. 437) .......................................................................................... 12 Brown v. Board of Education (1954, p. 446) ....................................................................... 13 C. Sex ........................................................................................................................................ 14 From pp. 596-97 (Note 1) ...................................................................................................... 15 Craig v. Boren (1976, p. 602) ...................................................................................................
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/21/2009 for the course LAW LAW 101 taught by Professor Bowman during the Spring '98 term at Cornell College.

Page1 / 127

Con Law Amar Outline-2001 - C ONSTITUTIONAL L AW I The...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online