395.Hinckley.v.Pittsburgh.Bessemer.Steel - Hinckley v...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Company Supreme Court of the United States 121 U.S. 264; 7 S. Ct. 875; 30 L. Ed. 967 Argued April 5, 1877. April 18, 1887, Decided PRIOR HISTORY: Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois [1] This was an action at law, brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, by the Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Company, (Limited,) a Pennsylvania corporation, against Francis E. Hinckley, to recover damages for the breach by Hinckley of a written contract for the purchase by him from the company of 6000 tons of steel rails. The contract was as follows: Memorandum of Sale. The Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Company (Limited) have sold and hereby agree to make and deliver to the order of F.E. Hinckley, Esq., 204 Dearborn St., Chicago, Ills., and the said Hinckley has purchased and agrees to pay for, six thousand gross tons of first-quality steel rails, to weigh fifty-two (52) pounds to the yard, and to be rolled true and smooth to the pattern to be furnished by the said Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Company, (Limited,) pattern No. 5. Said rails are to be made of the best quality of Bessemer steel, and to be subject to inspection as made and shipped, and to be well straightened and free from flaws, and to be drilled as may be directed; at least ninety per cent. shall be in thirty (30) feet lengths, with not over ten (10) per cent. of shorter lengths, diminishing by one foot differences, none to be less than twenty-four (24) feet. All second-quality rails or excess of shorts which may be made, not exceeding five (5) per cent. of each month's shipments, to be taken at the usual reduction of ten (10) per cent. in price, and to be piled and shipped separately, (painted white on both ends,) as may be ordered by the inspector. Deliveries to begin in May, 1882, in which month one thousand tons shall be delivered, and to continue at the rate of twenty-five hundred tons per month after July 1, 1882, until finished, strikes and accidents beyond ordinary control of said steel company, and acts of Providence preventing or suspending deliveries, alone excepted, in which case deliveries are to be delayed for a corresponding length of time only. 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Price to be fifty-eight dollars net, per ton of 2240 pounds of finished steel rails, ex. ship or f.o.b. cars at Chicago, Ills., seller's option. Terms of payment, cash on delivery of inspector's certificate for each five hundred tons as fast as delivered. If shipment is delayed without fault of said steel company, payment is to be made in cash upon completion and delivery of each five hundred tons at Chicago and inspector's certificate. Rails to be inspected at mill as fast as completed and ready for shipment. In witness whereof, the said Hinckley has hereto set his hand and seal, and the
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/28/2009 for the course ECON 322 taught by Professor Francisco during the Spring '07 term at Rutgers.

Page1 / 9

395.Hinckley.v.Pittsburgh.Bessemer.Steel - Hinckley v...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online