Lawrence and Judicial Activism Reconsiderd

Lawrence and Judicial Activism Reconsiderd - LAWRENCE VS...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

LAWRENCE VS. TEXAS & THOMAS SOWELL, “JUDICIAL ACTIVISM RECONSIDERED” Lawrence v. Texas Kennedy writing for court Question raised by this case: Is the Texas law criminalizing homosexual sodomy constitutional? “Liberty protects the person from unwarranted government intrusions into a dwelling or other private places…Liberty presumes an autonomy of self that includes freedom of thought, belief, expression, and certain intimate conduct.” “We conclude the case should be resolved by determining whether the petitioners were free as adults to engage in the private conduct in the exercise of their liberty under the Due Process Clause of the 14 th Amendment to the Constitution.” What is “liberty”? Right to be free from unwarranted government intrusion Role of courts in liberty-related cases: drawing (identifying) line between legitimate government power and illegitimate infringements of liberty Limiting what states can do creates and expands liberty. Fourteenth Amendment to Constitution (1868) “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law ; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws . Concepts of legal doctrine Precedent: court decision or body of decisions that a court adopts when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts Stare decisis : standing by and thus reconfirming previous court decision(s) on an issue Landmark decision: when court establishes a new precedent either by reinterpreting law(s) in a new way or creating a ruling in an area that previously had not been subject of a court case. Fundamental rights: those which are “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition” Precedents in privacy and liberty Griswold v. Connecticut (1965): unconstitutional for a state law to bar sale of or counseling about contraceptives; violates privacy rights of married couples.
Image of page 1

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.
  • Summer '07
  • SpearIt
  • Law, Lawrence v. Texas, homosexual sodomy

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern