AEM424memo1 - Memorandum#1 Creative Strategy Incorporated...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Memorandum #1 Creative Strategy, Incorporated CSI Akbar Alikhan, Christopher Barger, Kenkoku Seino, Gregory Stepniak
Image of page 1

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Market Analysis: Market C: We decided to enter Market C and this is currently the only market we have decided to operate in. The high differentiation of brands in Market C is what initially attracted our firm. When consumers identify with a brand, the price wars waged by opponents are rendered less effective. Undercutting an opponent from -5% to -20% only yields a 5% increase in market share. This is a 1/3 gain (5% gain in market share, 15% price change). Contrast this with the 2-to-1 gain we established earlier in Market A. Although the scrap value isn’t as high as Market B’s, it is still higher than in both Market A and Market D. Our cost structure highly favors Market C. The initial entry cost for the average firm is $70,000, but for CSI it is $53,613. This is over 1.6 standard deviations below the mean, and allows for a substantial head start in this market. As we saw in Market B, the initial savings in the entry cost may have been drowned out by the high variable costs in the long run. This probably would not occur in Market C. First, the savings in the initial entry cost is over $16,000, versus $5,000 from before. More importantly, CSI is not at a variable cost disadvantage in Market C as it was in Market B. Our cost of capacity per unit is $5 above the average, which accounts for a mere .63% disadvantage. Also, our marginal cost is $1 below the average, which translates into a 5% advantage. Considering the huge initial savings, the negligible cost of capacity disadvantage, and the slight marginal cost benefit, CSI appears to be best suited for Market C. Market A : Market A is an attractive candidate due to the low mean entry cost, however, this also means it may invite added competition. Although some brand loyalty does exist, most consumers will eventually vote with their wallets if the price differential is substantial. Undercutting an opponent from -5% to -10% yields a market share gain of 11%. This demonstrates that the change in price results in nearly a 2-to-1 gain in market share (11% gain, 5% change). Market A can sustain multiple firms, but only at low quantities; when
Image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern