PHL rev - How is resisting instincts a symptom of decline...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
How is resisting instincts a symptom of decline in Nietzsche? Nietzsche thinks “a life bright, cold, careful, aware, without and in resistance to instincts” is sick and it’s a formula to DECADENCE to have to fight instincts. He said, “As long as life is ascending, happiness is the same as instinct.” He argues that because we don’t have reason, so we should prefer our instinct. One idiosyncratic of Western philosophers is that they lack a sense of history and they deny history or they don’t believe in senses. Chief enemy of life—affirmation in West-Platonic dream of an “other” better world of transcendent forms, beyond sensory and material where we are now No “true world.” “Apparent world” is the only world. Revenge against this life is to fantasize another world or resisting instincts. Resisting instincts is a symptom of decline in Socrates, when he recognized his sickness by admitting his cave of bad cravings, and saying, “Living—that means being sick a long time.” The instinctive hatred of reality: the consequence of an extreme susceptibility to pain and irritation -- so great that merely to be "touched" becomes unendurable, for every sensation is too profound. An animal, a species, or an individual is "depraved" or "decadent" when it loses its instincts for that which sustains its life, and "prefers what is harmful to it.” Life itself presupposes an instinct for growth, for sustenance, for "the will to power", the striving for some degree of control and mastery of one's surroundings. Christianity sets itself up in opposition to those instincts and hence Christianity is an expression of decadence, a negation of the will to life. Nietzsche concludes that this "entire fictional world has its roots in the hatred of the natural" world (ex: kingdom of God, angels, sins, and other imaginaries), a hatred which reveals its origin. For "who alone has reason to lie himself out of actuality? He who suffers from it" Nietzsche feels that the idea of free will is restricting. His argument stems from the idea that the “nonsensical doctrine of freedom of will” is used to create moral blame. Nietzsche feels that the blame (specifically the view of Descartes) is not liberating and instead results in feelings of punishment and unworthiness. To be restricted in this way ultimately leads one on the path to following the morality of the slave and to deny essential parts of your humanity. What is Nietzsche’s evaluation of the equation: reason=virtue=happiness? Nietzsche refutes the idea that reason=virtue=happiness. He claims that this is Socrates’ doctrine and means of finding truth. However since good is no more desirable than evil, reason is not necessarily the route to happiness. Instead of finding value in the outside abstractions (ultimate good and evil) one can
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 10

PHL rev - How is resisting instincts a symptom of decline...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online